Hamilton v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 76

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 71 Motion for Leave to File (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2012)

Download PDF
1 Sean Reis (SBN 184004) sreis@edelson.com 2 EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP 3 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 4 Telephone: (949) 459-2124 Facsimile: (949) 459-2123 5 Jay Edelson (admitted pro hac vice) 6 jedelson@edelson.com 7 Steven L. Woodrow (admitted pro hac vice) swoodrow@edelson.com 8 Evan M. Meyers (admitted pro hac vice) emeyers@edelson.com 9 EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLC 10 350 North LaSalle, Suite 1300 Chicago, IL 60654 11 Telephone: (312) 589-6370 Facsimile: (312) 589-6378 12 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 OAKLAND DIVISION 17 18 MARIKA HAMILTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 19 Plaintiffs, 20 v. 21 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 22 Defendant. 23 Case No. C 09-4152 CW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AND SERVE A CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT The Honorable Claudia Wilken 24 25 26 Having considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File and Serve a Consolidated Amended 27 Class Action Complaint, the Court hereby orders: 28 Order Granting Leave to File and Serve a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint Case No. C 09-4152 CW 1 1. Plaintiff shall be granted leave to file and serve a Consolidated Amended Class 2 Action Complaint; 3 4 5 2. Plaintiff shall do so forthwith. Class Action Complaint is filed instanter. Plaintiff’s Consolidated Amended January 25th IT IS SO ORDERED, this ______ day of _______________, 2011. Entered: 6 7 _________________________________ United States District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Leave to File and Serve a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint Case No. C 09-4152 CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?