S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc. v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation

Filing 31

ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 5/10/2010. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. _______________________________/ The court is in receipt of the chambers copies of defendant Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation's motion for leave to file an amended answer and amended counterclaim, and supporting papers. The Request for Judicial Notice ("RJN") and the Declaration of Jay A. Christofferson, both filed in support of defendant's motion, are not in usable format. A document is in usable format if it is usable for the purpose for which it is submitted to the court. The RJN is not in usable format because it consists of a thick stack of loose paper, fastened only with a binder clip, which will in all likelihood become unfastened if the court attempts to review the contents of the document. In addition, the RJN includes numerous untabbed exhibits. The court is unable to locate exhibits in a thick document if they are not tabbed. Similarly, the Christofferson Declaration is not in usable format, No. C 09-4197 PJH ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 because it also contains numerous untabbed exhibits. The court will consider the contents of these documents only if copies in usable format are submitted no later than May 11, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 10, 2010 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?