Sleep Science Partners Inc v. Lieberman et al

Filing 180

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting in part and denying in part 167 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Joseph Ehrlich SBN 84359 Mark R. Meyer SBN 238231 LOSCH & EHRLICH 425 California Street, Suite 2025 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 956-8400 Facsimile: (415) 956-2150 E-mail: je@losch-ehrlich.com 5 6 7 8 9 Heather G. Flick SBN 184206 THE FLICK GROUP 425 California Street, Suite 2025 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 765-6685 Facsimile: (415) 956-2150 Attorneys for Plaintiff Sleep Science Partners, Inc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 SLEEP SCIENCE PARTNERS, INC., a California corporation, 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 Case No. CV09-4200CW Honorable Claudia Wilken ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL v. KATRINA WEBSTER, an individual, DANIEL WEBSTER, an individual, and SLEEPING WELL, LLC, a Vermont limited liability corporation, and DOES 1-10, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 On July 7, 2011, Defendants filed an administrative motion to seal. Docket No. 167. On July 14, 2011, Plaintiff, Plaintiff Sleep Science Partners, Inc. filed a declaration in support of the 23 24 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Order Re: Motion to Seal (Docket No. 167) Case No. CV09-4200CW 1 motion to seal. Based on the matters stated in the declaration of Heather Flick and good cause 2 appearing, the Court orders as follows: 3 4 5 The administrative motion to seal is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: 1. With respect to the Memorandum (Docket No. 168) filed by Defendants, the motion is 6 a. GRANTED as to page and line numbers i:25; 2:4-7; 3:24-26; 4:13-19; 4:20-28; 7 5:9-10; 5:11-15; 5:26-27; 6:10-11; 6:14-20; 6:22-7:11; 7:fn.4; 9:11-18; 19:3-4; 8 19:6-13; 19:14-24; 20:5; 20:10-23; 20:25-21:2, and b. DENIED as to page and line numbers 4:13-14; 5:3-7; 6:1-3; 6:3-7; 7:13-15; 7:16- 9 10 11 12 13 20; 21:10-11; 21:14-16; 21:22-24; 22:2-3; 22, fn. 13; and 24:5-9 2. With respect to the exhibits attached to the Declaration of Gary L. Franklin (Docket No. 168-2) filed by Defendants, the motion is a. GRANTED as to Exhibit 2, Document titled “The PureSleep Method”; b. DENIED as to Exhibit 3; c. GRANTED as to Exhibit 4, page and line numbers 63:16-64:8; 63:14-16; 63:20- 14 22; 70:4-22:72:6-73:2; 73:6-25 and otherwise DENIED. 15 d. GRANTED as to Exhibit 5, Deposition of Clark page and line numbers should be 16 filed under seal: 4:9-11; 18:25-19:14; 20:3-20:20; 24:18-25; 25:1-15; 28:1-24 and 17 otherwise DENIED; 18 e. GRANTED as to Exhibit 6; f. GRANTED as to Exhibit 7; 19 20 21 22 g. GRANTED as to Exhibit 8; h. GRANTED as to Exhibit 9, Deposition of McNeill, page and line numbers 37:1320; 37:22-25; 83:6-23; 84:3-6; 86:5-7; 87:2-8 and otherwise DENIED; i. GRANTED as to Exhibit 10; 23 24 2 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Order Re: Motion to Seal (Docket No. 167) Case No. CV09-4200CW 1 j. GRANTED as to Exhibit 12, Deposition of Fenton page and line numbers: 19:5- 2 21:25 and otherwise DENIED. k. GRANTED as to Exhibit 13, SSP Policies and Procedures Document. 3 l. GRANTED as to Exhibit 14, Deposition of Welker, pages and line numbers 4 366:18-19; 367:21-22; 368:7-9; 368:15-17; 368:20-24; 370:1-7; 370:18-24; 5 371:12-14, otherwise DENIED; 6 m. GRANTED as to Exhibit 18; 7 n. DENIED as to Exhibit 21, Deposition of Thomas; 8 o. GRANTED as to Exhibit 22, Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Interrogatories (Set One) Marked Highly Confidential Answer No. 2, Answer No. 17, lines 10- 9 18, and Answer No. 18, otherwise DENIED; and 10 11 p. GRANTED as to Exhibit 23 to 26. 3. With respect to the Declaration of Katrina Webster (Docket No. 169): a. GRANTED as to all of the portions of Katrina Webster’s declaration lodged 12 under seall 13 b. GRANTED as to Exhibit 3; and 14 c. GRANTED as to Exhibit 9 15 16 17 18 4. With respect to the Declaration of Daniel Webster (Docket No. 170) the motion is GRANTED as to page 2, lines 9-12. 5. With respect to the Declaration of Mary Kate Scott (Docket No. 172): a. GRANTED as to paragraphs 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 21, 22-47, including the headings written in bold. 19 b. GRANTED as to Exhibit B; 20 21 22 c. GRANTED as to Exhibit C, pages and lines 34:9; 37:21-22; 27:12-25; 28:1-6; 28:16-19; 28:23-24; 29:1-3; 29:11-25; and d. Otherwise DENIED To the extent that Defendants’ motion is granted with respect to portions of documents 23 24 3 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Order Re: Motion to Seal (Docket No. 167) Case No. CV09-4200CW 1 and denied as to others, Defendants shall electronically file appropriately redacted versions of the 2 documents in the public record and unredacted versions under seal. To the extent that 3 Defendants are granted leave to file under seal documents in their entirety, Defendants shall 4 electronically file them under seal. To the extent that Defendants’ motion is denied, they shall 5 electronically file the documents in the public record. Defendants shall comply with this Order 6 within three days of the date it is issued. 7 8 9 Dated: 7/21/2011 _____________________________ Hon. Claudia Wilken United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 4 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Order Re: Motion to Seal (Docket No. 167) Case No. CV09-4200CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?