Sleep Science Partners Inc v. Lieberman et al

Filing 206

ORDER Granting 205 Stipulation Modifying Agreed 35 Protective Order. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/19/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Joseph Ehrlich SBN 84359
LOSCH & EHRLICH
425 California Street, Suite 2025
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Heather G. Flick SBN 184206
THE FLICK GROUP
425 California Street, Suite 2025
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Sleep Science Partners, Inc.

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

OAKLAND DIVISION
15
16

SLEEP SCIENCE PARTNERS, INC., a
California corporation,

17

Case No. CV09-4200CW
Honorable Claudia Wilken

Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
22

vs.
AVERY LIEBERMAN, an individual,
KATRINA WEBSTER, an individual,
DANIEL WEBSTER, an individual,
SLEEPING WELL, LLC, a Vermont limited
liability corporation, and DOES 1-10,

STIPULATION TO MODIFY
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
DATED MARCH 10, 2010 (Docket #35)

23

Defendants.
24
25

Plaintiff Sleep Science Partners, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Katrina Webster,

26

Daniel Webster and Sleeping Well, LLC (“Defendants”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and

27

through their respective counsel, have agreed to the terms of this Order.
28
1
______________________________________________________________________________________

Stipulation to Modify Stipulated Protective Order Dated March 10, 2010 (Docket #35)
Case No. CV09-4200CW

1
2

WHEREAS, the Court entered a Stipulated Protective Order on or about March 10, 2010
(Docket #35) (the “Order”) governing the designation of information as confidential in this

3

litigation;
4
5

WHEREAS, paragraph 9 of the Order states that any information designated as

6

confidential can only be used for the purposes of this litigation and paragraph 12 of the Order

7

requires any modification to the Order to be in writing and approved of by the Court;

8

WHEREAS, the Parties wish to agree in writing to a limited modification of the Order to
9
10

permit Plaintiff to use the materials designated herein in an arbitration Plaintiff has filed against

11

Steven Welker with the AAA in San Francisco, CA, Case No. AAA 74 166 151 11 (the

12

“Arbitration”); and

13

WHEREAS, Steven Welker signed the Order and agreed to be bound by its terms on or

14

about June 11, 2010.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants stipulate to modify the Order as follows:
1. The parties agree to permit the following documents designated as confidential and/or
highly confidential attorneys’ eyes only in this litigation to be used in the Arbitration.
Bates #SW03579-confidential
Bates #SW03601-03602-HCAEO
Bates #SW03606-03607-HCAEO
Deposition Exhibit 72, Bates #SW02496-HCAEO
Deposition Exhibit 85, Bates #SW03519-03520-confidential
Deposition Exhibit 87, Bates #SW03468-03471-confidential
Deposition Exhibit 88, Bates #SW03484-03485-confidential
Deposition Exhibit 89, Bates #EURO00331-333-HCAEO
Deposition Exhibit 93, Bates #SW04344-04345-confidential
Deposition Exhibit 95, Bates #SW03467-confidential
Deposition Exhibit 101, Bates #SW03495-03496-confidential
Deposition Exhibit 103, Bates #SW03488-03490-confidential
Deposition Exhibit 107, Bates #SW03464-confidential
Deposition Exhibit 111, Bates #SW03361-03369-confidential
Deposition Exhibit 113, Bates #SW04352-HCAEO
2
______________________________________________________________________________________

Stipulation to Modify Stipulated Protective Order Dated March 10, 2010 (Docket #35)
Case No. CV09-4200CW

1
2
3
4
5

Deposition Exhibit 115, Bates #SW03576-03577-confidential
Deposition Exhibit 119, Bates #SW04343-HCAEO
Deposition Exhibit 132, Bates #SW03329-03331-HCAEO
Deposition Exhibit 133, Bates #SW02486-02487-HCAEO
Deposition Exhibit 142 (not labelled but designated as confidential by Defendants)
Deposition Exhibit 192, Bates #SW03565-confidential
2. The parties further agree to permit the use of Steven Welker’s deposition in the

6

Arbitration for the sole purposes of impeachment.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

3. The parties further agreed that the following documents produced in this litigation but
which have no designation of confidentiality may be used in the Arbitration:
Deposition Exhibit 81, Bates #SW3611
Deposition Exhibit 82, Bates #SW3629
Deposition Exhibit 83, Bates #SW3632
Deposition Exhibit 86, Bates #SW3635
Deposition Exhibit 91, Bates #SW3766
Deposition Exhibit 92, Bates #SW3772-4
Deposition Exhibit 94, Bates #SW03630-none
Deposition Exhibit 110, Bates #SW3637-8
Deposition Exhibit 114, Bates #SW3627
Deposition Exhibit 121, EURO #382
Deposition Exhibit 197, Bates #SW1961-2

17

4. The parties agree to permit Heather Flick of SSP to view the above referenced
18
19

documents previously marked as highly confidential attorneys’ eyes only in this

20

litigation for purposes of the Arbitration.

21
22

5. All documents designated by the parties as Confidential and/or Highly Confidential
Attorneys’ Eyes Only, including those referenced herein, shall otherwise remain

23

subject to the terms of the Order. The terms of the Order shall govern the disclosure
24
25

and use of the documents referenced herein in the Arbitration.

26

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

27

9/19/2011
Dated:_____________

28

By:
CLAUDIA WILKEN, United States District Judge

3
______________________________________________________________________________________

Stipulation to Modify Stipulated Protective Order Dated March 10, 2010 (Docket #35)
Case No. CV09-4200CW

1

Respectfully submitted,

2
3

Dated: September 16, 2011

4

THE FLICK GROUP
By: /S/ Heather Flick
Heather Flick, Attorneys for Plaintiff

5
6
7
8
9
10

Dated: September 16, 2011

PRIMMER PIPER EGGLESTON & CRAMER
By: /S/ Gary Franklin
Gary Franklin, Attorneys for Defendants

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
______________________________________________________________________________________

Stipulation to Modify Stipulated Protective Order Dated March 10, 2010 (Docket #35)
Case No. CV09-4200CW