Wright v. Hedgepath et al

Filing 80

ORDER Vacating Status Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 05/10/2013. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 EUREKA DIVISION 8 9 DEMETRIUS AHMED WRIGHT, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, No. 4:09-CV-4358 CW (NJV) ORDER VACATING STATUS CONFERENCE v. 12 A. HEDGEPETH, et al., 13 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 14 15 This case is now set for a telephonic status conference on Tuesday, May 14, 2013. On 16 May 9, 2013, Chief Judge Claudia Wilken entered an order referring this case to the Federal Pro 17 Bono Project and staying proceedings until counsel is appointed. (Doc. 78.) Accordingly, the 18 status conference set for May 14, 2013, is HEREBY VACATED and will be reset following the 19 appointment of counsel. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 24 Dated: May 10, 2013 25 26 27 28 NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 EUREKA DIVISION 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. A. HEDGEPETH, et al, Defendants. / 12 13 No. 4:09-CV-04358 CW (NJV) DEMETRIUS AHMED WRIGHT, I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on May 10, 2013, I served a true and correct copy of 14 the attached by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed below, 15 by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail. 16 17 18 19 Demetrius Ahmed Wright T65802 California Institute for Men Facility C/Calusa 128 P.O. Box 500 Chino, CA 91708 20 23 Litigation Coordinator Michael Gill California Institution for Men PO Box 128 Chino, CA 91708-0128 (also by fax) 24 Dated: May 10, 2013 21 22 25 26 27 /s/ Linn Van Meter Linn Van Meter Administrative Law Clerk to the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?