Wright v. Hedgepath et al
Filing
80
ORDER Vacating Status Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 05/10/2013. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
EUREKA DIVISION
8
9
DEMETRIUS AHMED WRIGHT,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
No. 4:09-CV-4358 CW (NJV)
ORDER VACATING
STATUS CONFERENCE
v.
12
A. HEDGEPETH, et al.,
13
Defendants.
___________________________________/
14
15
This case is now set for a telephonic status conference on Tuesday, May 14, 2013. On
16
May 9, 2013, Chief Judge Claudia Wilken entered an order referring this case to the Federal Pro
17
Bono Project and staying proceedings until counsel is appointed. (Doc. 78.) Accordingly, the
18
status conference set for May 14, 2013, is HEREBY VACATED and will be reset following the
19
appointment of counsel.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
24
Dated: May 10, 2013
25
26
27
28
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
EUREKA DIVISION
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
A. HEDGEPETH, et al,
Defendants.
/
12
13
No. 4:09-CV-04358 CW (NJV)
DEMETRIUS AHMED WRIGHT,
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on May 10, 2013, I served a true and correct copy of
14
the attached by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed below,
15
by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail.
16
17
18
19
Demetrius Ahmed Wright
T65802
California Institute for Men
Facility C/Calusa 128
P.O. Box 500
Chino, CA 91708
20
23
Litigation Coordinator Michael Gill
California Institution for Men
PO Box 128
Chino, CA 91708-0128
(also by fax)
24
Dated: May 10, 2013
21
22
25
26
27
/s/ Linn Van Meter
Linn Van Meter
Administrative Law Clerk to the
Honorable Nandor J. Vadas
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?