Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 178

ORDER Granting 173 Stipulation regarding modification of briefing schedule and dispositive motion and claim construction hearingPursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a). Case Management Statement due by 6/16/2011. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/23/2011 02:00 PM. Motion Hearing set for 6/23/2011 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/21/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304)
[e-mail]
DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
RYAN K. YAGURA (S.B. #197619)
[e-mail]
NICHOLAS J. WHILT (S.B. #247738)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
400 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071-2899
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
DARIN J. GLASSER (S.B. #223788)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
610 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, California 92660
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff
Apple Inc.

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

18
19
20

AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC, a
Texas Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant,

21
22

v.

23

APPLE INC., a California Corporation,

24

CASE NO. CV 09-4436-CW
STIPULATION REGARDING
MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION
AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING;
ORDER

Defendant and
Counterclaim-Plaintiff.

25

Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken

26
27
28
CV 09-4436-CW

STIPULATION RE MODIFICATION OF
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND DISPOSITIVE
MOTION HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant

2

Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC (“Affinity”) and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Apple Inc.

3

(“Apple”) as follows:

4
5
6

WHEREAS, the parties prefer to depose technical experts prior to completion of briefing
on dispositive motions and claim construction;
WHEREAS, although the parties are working diligently to meet the current case deadlines,

7

the parties need additional time to complete depositions of expert witnesses based on the

8

availability of one or more experts;

9

WHEREAS, Affinity and Apple wish to modify the current briefing schedule on

10

dispositive motions and claim construction, which modification necessarily impacts the hearing

11

date for such motions;

12

WHEREAS, the parties have reached agreement on how to proceed regarding the briefing

13

schedule and have confirmed that the proposed dispositive motion and claim construction hearing

14

date is available on the Court’s calendar;

15

WHEREAS, the parties’ proposed modifications will not impact the trial date;

16

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE

17

PARTIES HERETO, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL AND SUBJECT TO THE

18

APPROVAL OF THE COURT, AS FOLLOWS:

19

1. Affinity’s claim construction and case dispositive motion shall be due by May

20

6, 2011 (formerly April 26, 2011);

21

2. Apple’s opposition to Affinity’s motion and case dispositive motion shall be

22

due by May 24, 2011 (formerly May 10, 2011);

23

3. Affinity’s reply and opposition to Apple’s case dispositive motion shall be due

24

by June 2, 2011 (formerly May 17, 2011);

25

4. Apple’s reply shall be due by June 9, 2011 (formerly May 24, 2011);

26

5. The parties respectfully request that the hearing on dispositive motions and

27

claim construction occur on June 23, 2011 (formerly June 9, 2011);

28
CV 09-4436-CW

-1-

STIPULATION RE MODIFICATION OF
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND DISPOSITIVE
MOTION HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Dated: April 20, 2011

3

GEORGE A. RILEY
DARIN W. SNYDER
RYAN K. YAGURA
DARIN J. GLASSER
NICHOLAS J. WHILT

4

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

2

5
6

By: /s/ Darin J. Glasser
Darin J. Glasser

7

Attorneys for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff APPLE INC.

8
9

11

RICHARD L. SEABOLT
L. NORWOOD JAMESON
MATTHEW C. GAUDET
BRIAN MCQUILLEN

12

DUANE MORRIS LLP

10

Dated: April 20, 2011

13
14

By:

15
16

/s/ Matthew C. Gaudet
Matthew C. Gaudet

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS,
LLC

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CV 09-4436-CW

-2-

STIPULATION RE MODIFICATION OF
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND DISPOSITIVE
MOTION HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of
this document has been obtained from Matt Gaudet.

3
4

Dated: April 20, 2011

5
6

GEORGE A. RILEY
DARIN W. SNYDER
RYAN K. YAGURA
DARIN J. GLASSER
NICHOLAS J. WHILT
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

7
8

By: /s/ Darin J. Glasser
Darin J. Glasser

9
10

Attorneys for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff APPLE INC.

11
12
13
14

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Case management conference is also
continued to the new hearing date.

15
16

4/21/2011
Dated:______________

17

_______________________________________
Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CV 09-4436-CW

-3-

STIPULATION RE MODIFICATION OF
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND DISPOSITIVE
MOTION HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER