Golden Gate Way, LLC v. Stewart et al

Filing 282

ORDER on 281 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE filed by Leonard A. Gross.Motion Hearing set for 8/23/2012 11:00 AM. Responses due by 8/2/2012. Replies due by 8/9/2012. Case Management Conference set for 8/23/2012 11:00 AM. Case Management Statement due by 8/16/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 6/15/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2012)

Download PDF
Case4:09-cv-04458-DMR Document281 Filed06/14/12 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 WILLIAM F. TARANTINO (BAR NO. 215343) ALEJANDRO BRAS (BAR NO. 280558) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street, Suite 3300 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 Attorneys for Defendant Leonard A. Gross 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GOLDEN GATE WAY, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, No. CV 09-04458-DMR 12 Plaintiff, Assigned for All Purposes to Magistrate Judge Honorable Donna M. Ryu, Ctrm 4, 3rd Fl. 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 19 JEANNE STEWART, JEANNE’S HAMLIN CLEANERS, JEANNE STEWART dba HAMLIN CLEANERS, TOMMY LEE STEWART, LEONARD A. GROSS, LEONARD A. GROSS PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, MARTINO FAMILY TRUST, PAULINE F. KIDWELL AND GERALD MARTINO, TRUSTEES, ESTATE OF RONALD MONROE, DECEASED, ESTATE OF MATTHEW MONROE, DECEASED and DOES 1-10, inclusive, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ; ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Hearing Date: TBD Time: TBD Action Filed: September 22, 2009 Trial Date: January 24, 2013 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case CV 09-04458-DMR 1 Case4:09-cv-04458-DMR Document281 Filed06/14/12 Page2 of 3 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 6.2(a), the agreement of the undersigned parties and following 2 discussion with the clerk of Court, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate to and request the 3 following schedule for the briefing and hearing of Plaintiff Golden Gateway LLC’s Motion to 4 Appoint a Guardian Ad Litem for Leonard A. Gross. The parties jointly request this 5 extension of time to conduct additional informal fact discovery and investigation into Mr. 6 Gross’s solvency, competency, and potential liabilty in this matter. 7 1. 8 August 2, 2012. 9 2. 10 Defendant’s opposition papers will be filed with the Court on or before Thursday, Plaintiff’s reply papers will be filed with the Court on or before Thursday, August 9, 2012. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case CV 09-04458-DMR 2 Case4:09-cv-04458-DMR Document281 Filed06/14/12 Page3 of 3 1 2 3. The hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of a guardian ad litem for Defendant Leonard A. Gross is set for Thursday, August 23, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. PDT. 3 4 Dated: June 14, 2012 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP WILLIAM F. TARANTINO 5 6 By: 7 Attorneys for Defendant LEONARD A. GROSS. /s/ William F. Tarantino (ECF) 8 9 Dated: June 14, 2012 HANSON BRIDGET LLP JOHN CU 10 11 By: /s/ John Cu (ECF) 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff GOLDEN GATE WAY, LLC and Cross-Defendants WILLIAM AND YOLANDA PEACOCK 13 14 15 Dated: June 14, 2012 WOOD SMITH HENNING & BERMAN LLP DAVID WOOD 16 17 By: /s/ David Wood (ECF) 18 Attorneys for Defendants and Cross-Defendants, JEANNE STEWART, JEANNE’S HAMLIN CLEANERS, JEANNE STEWART dba HAMLIN CLEANERS and TOMMY LEE STEWART 19 20 21 ORDER 22 S u a M. Ry ge Donn Jud STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE NO 28 DIFI AS MO RT H Case CV 09-04458-DMR ER 3 N R NIA 27 _______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ERED DONNA M. RYU IS SO ORD ED IT FO 26 UNIT ED June 15, 2012 Dated:____________________ RT U O 25 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T LI 24 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the 8/1/12 case management conference is continued to 8/23/12 at 11:00 a.m. The joint case management conference statement is due 8/16/12. A 23 F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?