Golden Gate Way, LLC v. Stewart et al
Filing
287
AMENDED ORDER Regarding Opposition to 277 Plaintiff's MOTION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem FOR DEFENDANT LEONARD A. GROSS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/07/2012. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
GOLDEN GATE WAY, LLC,
9
Plaintiff,
v.
11
STEWART ET AL,
12
AMENDED ORDER REGARDING
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO APPOINT GUARDIAN AD
LITEM
Defendants.
___________________________________/
13
14
On April 20, 2012, Plaintiff Golden Gate Way, LLC filed a motion to appoint a guardian ad
litem for Defendant Leonard A. Gross and to substitute the guardian ad litem in his stead in the event
16
this court is to find Defendant Gross incompetent. [Docket No. 277.] By stipulation of the parties
17
and subsequent Order, any opposition to the motion was to be filed by no later than August 31,
18
2012. [Docket No. 284.] A hearing on the motion and Case Management Conference is set for
19
September 27, 2012. To date, no opposition nor statement of non-opposition to the motion has been
20
filed by any party, including Defendant Gross. The court’s tentative ruling is to find Defendant
21
Gross incompetent and to appoint his son, Barry Gross, as guardian ad litem. If any party objects to
22
any portion of the court’s tentative ruling, that party shall file objections by no later than September
23
12, 2012. Any objections must be specific and supported by law, and shall be no longer than three
24
pages.
R NIA
. Ryu
onna M
Judge D
RT
H
ER
FO
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
NO
28
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
LI
27
Dated: September 7, 2012
A
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
25
S
15
UNIT
ED
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 09-04458 DMR
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?