Pizzo v. Newsom et al

Filing 12

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING 9 Request to Stay. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken, on 12/10/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2009) Modified on 12/11/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [Proposed] Order Granting Stay of Proceedings (cv-09-4493-TEH) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THERESE MARIE PIZZO, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MAYOR GAVIN NEWSOM, in both his individual and official capacities; FORMER SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF OF POLICE HEATHER FONG; in both her individual and official capacities; SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT CHIEF OF POLICE GEORGE GASCON; in his official capacity; SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF MICHAEL HENNESSEY, in both his individual and official capacities; CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; and STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL EDMUND G. BROWN, in his official capacity, Defendants. cv-09-4493-CW ORDER GRANTING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS AS MODIFIED Judge Trial Date Honorable Claudia Wilken None Set Action Filed: September 23, 2009 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that further proceedings in this matter, including all deadlines set in the current case management order, are stayed pending further order of the Court. The deadlines set by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and local rules for filing pleadings responsive to the complaint are suspended pending further order of the court, except the Case Management Conference shall remain set for 4/6/10. If a ruling has not been issued by the U.S. Supreme Court, the CMC may be continued by stipulation. 12/10/09 DATED: _________________________ ___________________________________ Honorable Claudia Wilken U.S. District Court Judge SA2009102556 10507632.doc 2 [Proposed] Order Granting Stay of Proceedings (cv-09-4493-TEH)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?