Pizzo v. Newsom et al

Filing 44

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATIONS 37 MOTION FOR AMICUS CURIAE STATUS. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
No. C 09-04493 CW

8

THERESE MARIE PIZZO,

9

Plaintiff,

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

ORDER GRANTING
NATIONAL RIFLE
ASSOCIATION’S MOTION
FOR AMICUS CURIAE
STATUS
(Docket No. 37)

v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et
al.,
Defendants.

13

/

14
15

The National Rifle Association (NRA) moves for amicus curiae

16

status in this action.

17

(CCSF) opposes the motion.

18

respond to the NRA’s motion.

19

Defendant City and County of San Francisco
Plaintiff Therese Marie Pizzo did not

Having considered the papers submitted by the NRA and the

20

CCSF, the Court GRANTS the NRA’s motion.

In response to any

21

dispositive motion filed by the CCSF, the NRA may file a brief, not

22

to exceed fifteen pages, that addresses only Plaintiff’s claims

23

regarding San Francisco Police Code sections 4512, 1290 and

24

613.10(g).

25

files her opposition to the CCSF’s dispositive motion and shall not

26

repeat any arguments raised by Plaintiff.

27

Plaintiff’s opposition and the NRA’s arguments in a brief not to

28

exceed thirty pages, due seven days after the NRA’s response is

The NRA’s brief shall be due two days after Plaintiff

The CCSF may respond to

1

filed.

2

motion.

3

The NRA may appear at the hearing on the CCSF’s dispositive

The NRA shall not participate in this litigation in any manner

4

not provided by this Order.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated:

5/5/2011
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2