Pizzo v. Newsom et al

Filing 89

ORDER FURTHER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/2/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2012)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

THERESE MARIE PIZZO,

5

Plaintiff,

6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

v.
CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO;
KAMALA HARRIS, in her official
capacity as California Attorney
General; EDWIN LEE, in his
official capacity as Mayor of the
City & County of San Francisco;
GREG SUHR, in his official
capacity as San Francisco Police
Chief; and VICKI HENNESSY, in her
official capacity as the Sheriff
of San Francisco,

13
14
15

No. C 09-4493 CW
ORDER FURTHER
MODIFYING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON
DISPOSITIVE
MOTIONS

Defendants.
________________________________/
On July 2, 2012, the Court granted Legal Community Against

16

Violence (LCAV)’s motion for amicus curiae status in this action,

17

and modified the briefing and hearing schedule for dispositive

18

motions.

19

See Docket No. 70.

Defendants’ oppositions and cross-motions for summary

20

judgment were due on June 28, 2012; however, the Court experienced

21

a technical failure with the Electronic Case File (ECF) program on

22

June 28 and 29, 2012, which hindered the electronic filing of

23

documents on those days.

24

cross-motions on July 2, 2012, pursuant to Civil Local Rule

25

5-1(e)(5).

26

further the remainder of the briefing schedule on the dispositive

27

motions as follows:

28

Defendants filed their oppositions and

Accordingly, the Court finds good cause to modify

1

Event

Date

2

Deadline for LCAV to file its
brief, not to exceed fifteen
pages, which shall not repeat
any arguments raised by
Defendants.

Monday, July 9, 2012

Deadline for Plaintiff to file
her reply in support of her
motion for summary judgment,
opposition to Defendants’
motions for summary judgment and
response to LCAV’s arguments,
contained in a single brief of
fifty pages or less.

Monday, July 16, 2012

Deadline for the National Rifle
Association (NRA) to file its
amicus brief of fifteen pages or
less, addressing San Francisco
Police Code sections 4512, 1290
and 613.10(g) only and not
repeating any arguments raised
by Plaintiff.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Deadline for Defendant Attorney
General to file her reply in
support of her motion for
summary judgment, contained in a
brief of fifteen pages or less.

Monday, July 23, 2012

Deadline for the San Francisco
Defendants to file their reply
in support of their motion for
summary judgment and response to
the NRA’s brief, contained in a
single brief of thirty pages or
less.

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Hearing on the parties’ motions
for summary judgment and further
case management conference.

Thursday, August 9, 2012, at
2:00 p.m.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

As the Court noted in the prior order, the final pretrial

25

conference and trial dates may need to be continued.

26

will entertain a stipulation or motion to change the schedule set

27

forth above, provided that the parties’ briefs are filed in series

28
2

The Court

1

as set forth above and not simultaneously, and that briefing is

2

completed at least two weeks prior to the hearing date.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6

Dated:

7/2/2012

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3