Pizzo v. Newsom et al

Filing 90

ORDER STRIKING SEPARATE 87 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT KAMALA HARRIS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/2/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2012)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

THERESE MARIE PIZZO,

5

Plaintiff,

6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14

No. C 09-4493 CW

v.
CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO;
KAMALA HARRIS, in her official
capacity as California Attorney
General; EDWIN LEE, in his
official capacity as Mayor of the
City & County of San Francisco;
GREG SUHR, in his official
capacity as San Francisco Police
Chief; and VICKI HENNESSY, in her
official capacity as the Sheriff
of San Francisco,

ORDER STRIKING
SEPARATE
EVIDENTIARY
OBJECTIONS OF
DEFENDANT KAMALA
HARRIS (Docket No.
87)

Defendants.
________________________________/

15

On July 2, 2012, Defendant Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General

16

of California, filed her twenty-three page opposition to Plaintiff

17

Therese Marie Pizzo’s motion for summary judgment and cross-motion

18

for summary judgment.

19

concurrently filed a separate eleven page document consisting of

20

objections to Plaintiff’s evidence in support of her motion for

21

summary judgment.

22

Docket No. 81.

Attorney General Harris

Docket No. 87.

Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) provides that, when a party files an

23

opposition to a motion, “[a]ny evidentiary and procedural

24

objections to the motion must be contained within the brief or

25

memorandum,” which may not exceed twenty-five pages of text.

26

Attorney General has filed her evidentiary objections separately

27

from her brief.

28

thirty-three pages of text.

The

Further, between the two documents, she has filed

1

Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the Attorney General’s

2

separate evidentiary objections (Docket No. 87).

3

leave to amend and refile her opposition and cross-motion

4

incorporating any evidentiary objections, within one day of the

5

date of this Order.

6

not exceed twenty-five pages.

7

She is granted

The amended opposition and cross-motion shall

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

Dated:

7/2/2012

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2