Pizzo v. Newsom et al
Filing
90
ORDER STRIKING SEPARATE 87 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT KAMALA HARRIS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/2/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
THERESE MARIE PIZZO,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
No. C 09-4493 CW
v.
CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO;
KAMALA HARRIS, in her official
capacity as California Attorney
General; EDWIN LEE, in his
official capacity as Mayor of the
City & County of San Francisco;
GREG SUHR, in his official
capacity as San Francisco Police
Chief; and VICKI HENNESSY, in her
official capacity as the Sheriff
of San Francisco,
ORDER STRIKING
SEPARATE
EVIDENTIARY
OBJECTIONS OF
DEFENDANT KAMALA
HARRIS (Docket No.
87)
Defendants.
________________________________/
15
On July 2, 2012, Defendant Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General
16
of California, filed her twenty-three page opposition to Plaintiff
17
Therese Marie Pizzo’s motion for summary judgment and cross-motion
18
for summary judgment.
19
concurrently filed a separate eleven page document consisting of
20
objections to Plaintiff’s evidence in support of her motion for
21
summary judgment.
22
Docket No. 81.
Attorney General Harris
Docket No. 87.
Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) provides that, when a party files an
23
opposition to a motion, “[a]ny evidentiary and procedural
24
objections to the motion must be contained within the brief or
25
memorandum,” which may not exceed twenty-five pages of text.
26
Attorney General has filed her evidentiary objections separately
27
from her brief.
28
thirty-three pages of text.
The
Further, between the two documents, she has filed
1
Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the Attorney General’s
2
separate evidentiary objections (Docket No. 87).
3
leave to amend and refile her opposition and cross-motion
4
incorporating any evidentiary objections, within one day of the
5
date of this Order.
6
not exceed twenty-five pages.
7
She is granted
The amended opposition and cross-motion shall
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Dated:
7/2/2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?