Craters & Freighters v. Daisychain Enterprises et al

Filing 172

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO COMPLY WITH COURT'S ORDERS. Signed by Judge Wilken on 7/15/2014. (cwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2014)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 No. C 09-04531 CW CRATERS & FREIGHTERS, Plaintiff, 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO COMPLY WITH COURT’S ORDERS v. DAISYCHAIN ENTERPRISES, dba FREIGHT & CRATE; CATHY BENZ; and FRED BENZ. Defendants. ________________________________/ On June 30, 2014, the Court entered an order awarding 13 Plaintiff $15,622.15 in attorneys’ fees and costs (Docket No. 165) 14 and an order granting Plaintiff $1,000 in contempt sanctions 15 (Docket No. 166). 16 Plaintiff within seven days of the date of the order. 17 awarding attorneys’ fees and costs advised Defendants that if they 18 were unable to pay the full $15,622.15 within seven days of the 19 date of the order, they must pay “what they can” and “file a 20 financial affidavit and a proposed payment plan within seven days 21 of the date of [the June 30] order.” 22 Both orders directed Defendants to pay The order Docket No. 165. On July 7, 2014, the day that payment of both amounts or 23 partial payment and a financial affidavit and proposed payment 24 plan were due, Defendants filed a “Motion for 30 Day Extension of 25 Court’s Orders of June 30, 2014.” 26 stated that they were “in the process of collecting funds as 27 ordered by the Court but will need 30 days to attain said funds.” 28 Docket No. 168. In that motion, Defendants However, Defendants did not submit any financial 1 affidavits to support a finding that they are unable to pay any 2 portion of the $16,622.15 due or that they required thirty days to 3 pay the amount in full. 4 Defendants any extension on payment of $1,000 in contempt 5 sanctions. 6 Moreover, the Court did not offer On July 8, 2014, the Court denied Defendants’ motion for extension of time and ordered Defendants to pay Plaintiff 8 $16,622.15 within three days of the date of that order. 9 again advised that, if Defendants were not able to pay the full 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 7 amount within three days, they must pay at least the $1,000 in 11 contempt sanctions and any portion of the attorneys’ fees and 12 costs that they were then able to pay. 13 that, if Defendants made a partial payment, they must also file a 14 financial affidavit disclosing all assets and liabilities, signed 15 under penalty of perjury, and a proposed payment plan, within 16 three days of the date of the order. 17 The Court The Court further ordered On July 15, 2014, two days after the deadline set out in the 18 Court’s July 8 order, the Court received various documents from 19 Defendants. 20 in the amount of $16,622.15 and a declaration from Defendant Fred 21 Benz that states that “all monies provided for in the matter on 22 file herein have been deposited with the Clerk of the District 23 Court and credited and posted in the above captioned action.” 24 Docket No. 171. 25 for whose benefit this order is being presented is entitled to 26 withdraw the sum of $16,622.15.” 27 not submitted any payment to the Court, only the purported 28 promissory note. These documents include a purported promissory note The declaration further indicates that “the party Id. However, Defendants have Moreover, the Court directed Defendants to make 2 1 payment to Plaintiff, not to the Court. 2 made no effort to comply with the Court’s prior orders directing 3 them to make full payment or to make partial payment, along with a 4 financial affidavit and a proposed payment plan. 5 Again, Defendants have The Court again orders Defendants to pay Plaintiff $16,622.15 6 within three days of the date of this order. 7 not able to pay this amount within three days of the date of this 8 order, they must pay at least the $1,000 in contempt sanctions and 9 any amount of the attorneys’ fees and costs that they are If Defendants are United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 currently able to pay. 11 must also file a financial affidavit disclosing all assets and 12 liabilities, signed under penalty of perjury, and a proposed 13 payment plan, within three days of the date of this order. 14 Defendants do not comply with the Court’s order within three days 15 of the date of this order, Defendants are ordered to show cause 16 why they should not be assessed $100 in contempt sanctions for 17 every day, beginning July 21, 2014, that they do not comply with 18 the Court’s order. 19 response to the order to show cause is due within four days of the 20 date of this order. 21 If Defendants make a partial payment, they If Unless Defendants comply with this order, the IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 Dated: 7/15/14 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?