Northwest Administrators, Inc. v. Curtain Air Freight, Inc.

Filing 11

STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT AND REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: That Plaintiff shall recover judgment from Defendants in the amount of $44,327.83. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 3/8/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2010) Modified on 3/11/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
ERSKINE & TULLEY A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2 MICHAEL J. CARROLL (St. Bar #50246) 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 303 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 392-5431 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT AND REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC.,) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) vs. ) ) ) CURTIN AIR FREIGHT, a California ) corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ___________________________________ ) No. C 09 4545 SBA JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT AND REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE It appearing that Plaintiffs NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., the administrators of the Western Conference of Teamster Pension Trust Fund, and defendant, CURTIN AIR FREIGHT, a California corporation, have stipulated that Plaintiffs have and recover judgment from Defendants and it appearing that the Stipulation is in all respects proper and that the stipulation provides for judgment against defendant in the amount of $44,327.83, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff, NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., the administrators of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, and defendant, CURTIN AIR FREIGHT INC., a California corporation, in the amount of $ 44,327.83, which amount is composed of the following: 1. Contributions for the period June 2009 through August 2009 in the amount of $36,298.86. 2. Liquidated damages due and unpaid to the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund for the months of June 2009 through August 2009 on Pension Account Number 301540 in the total amount of $ 7,259.97; 3. Interest due pursuant to contract in the amount of $ 319.20; 4. Costs of suit incurred in this action in the amount of $ 450.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that execution will not issue on the judgment so long as defendant fully complies with the following conditions: 1. Defendant shall pay the amount of the judgment in eighteen (18) equal monthly installments of $2,462.65, commencing on January 25, 2010 and continuing on the twenty fifth (25th) day of each of the eighteen (18) months until the full amount of the judgment is paid. Each of said payments will be made by check payable to the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund and should be sent to ERSKINE & TULLEY, 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 303, San Francisco, CA 94104, attention Sharon Eastman. 2. employees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that upon the failure of defendant to make any of the payments in a timely manner as required above, judgment will be entered only after 10 days written notice to defendant and defendants counsel of a default in payments. If the default is not cured plaintiffs attorney may file a declaration JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT AND REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 Defendant shall pay current pension contributions on time while installment payments are being made, for any periods in which defendant has covered 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 by plaintiff or by plaintiff's attorneys stating that a default has occurred on the part of defendant and requesting the appointment of a magistrate judge to hold a hearing in the event of a dispute over the payment plan. Dated: 3/8/10 By:___________________________________ Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT AND REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?