Hopkins v. San Francisco Police Department et al

Filing 39

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING 32 SECOND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)

Download PDF
Hopkins v. San Francisco Police Department et al Doc. 39 1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. / KEVIN LAMAR HOPKINS, Plaintiff, No. C 09-04578 CW (PR) ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Before the Court is Plaintiff's second motion for appointment of counsel to represent him in this action. The Court previously For denied Plaintiff's first request for appointment of counsel. the same reasons, Plaintiff's second request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. This Order terminates Docket no. 32. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/1/2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEVIN LAMAR HOPKINS, 4 Plaintiff, 5 v. 6 SAN FRANCISCO POLICE et al, 7 Defendant. 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Kevin L. Hopkins V76611 Bldg. 510 / 40U Avenal State Prison P.O. Box 9 Avenal, CA 93204 Dated: March 1, 2011 / Case Number: CV09-04578 CW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on March 1, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?