Hopkins v. San Francisco Police Department et al

Filing 58

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 57 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION REGARDING DEADLINES. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2011)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

KEVIN LAMAR HOPKINS,

5

Plaintiff,

6
7
8
9

No. C 09-4578 CW
ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS'
ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR
CLARIFICATION
REGARDING
DEADLINES (Docket
No. 57)

v.
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT;
OFFICER AUGUST and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
________________________________/

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

Defendants request clarification regarding the date by which

12

pretrial documents shall be submitted to the Court.

13

Order for Pretrial Preparation in pro se Prisoner Cases sets forth

14

a series of deadlines that flow from the date of the pretrial

15

conference scheduled in a given action.

16

the Court will resolve pretrial matters on the papers, rather than

17

holding a pretrial conference.

18

This Court's

However, in this case,

For the purpose of clarification, the deadlines are set as if

19

there were a pretrial conference scheduled for December 20, 2011.

20

Accordingly, submissions that are due to the Court twenty-eight

21

days before the pretrial conference are due November 22, 2011.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: 10/21/2011

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge