Piper v. Correctional Training Facility Central Infirmary et al
Filing
28
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Denying 27 Third Motion to Appoint Counsel. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2011)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
MICHAEL DOUGLAS PIPER,
4
5
6
No. C 09-04653 CW (PR)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING THIRD MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
v.
7
CORRECTIONAL TRAINING FACILITY,
et al.,
8
Defendants.
/
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff has filed his third motion for appointment of
counsel to represent him in this action.
The Court previously
denied Plaintiff's two requests for appointment of counsel.
For
the same reasons, Plaintiff's third motion for the appointment of
counsel (docket no. 27) is DENIED.
This Order terminates Docket no. 27.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 4/15/2011
CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
MICHAEL DOUGLAS PIPER,
Case Number: CV09-04653 CW
4
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
5
v.
6
7
8
CORRECTIONAL TRAINING FACILITY et
al,
Defendant.
/
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on April 15, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
14
15
16
17
18
19
Michael Douglas Piper J49677
D-Wing 227L
Correctional Training Facility
P.O. Box 689
Soledad, CA 93960
Dated: April 15, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?