Piper v. Correctional Training Facility Central Infirmary et al

Filing 28

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Denying 27 Third Motion to Appoint Counsel. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2011)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 MICHAEL DOUGLAS PIPER, 4 5 6 No. C 09-04653 CW (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING THIRD MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL v. 7 CORRECTIONAL TRAINING FACILITY, et al., 8 Defendants. / 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff has filed his third motion for appointment of counsel to represent him in this action. The Court previously denied Plaintiff's two requests for appointment of counsel. For the same reasons, Plaintiff's third motion for the appointment of counsel (docket no. 27) is DENIED. This Order terminates Docket no. 27. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 4/15/2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 MICHAEL DOUGLAS PIPER, Case Number: CV09-04653 CW 4 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 5 v. 6 7 8 CORRECTIONAL TRAINING FACILITY et al, Defendant. / 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on April 15, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 14 15 16 17 18 19 Michael Douglas Piper J49677 D-Wing 227L Correctional Training Facility P.O. Box 689 Soledad, CA 93960 Dated: April 15, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?