Paulick v. Eliseo Oaks, L.P.

Filing 9

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 2/16/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2010) Modified on 2/18/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
SIDNEY J. COHEN, ESQ., State Bar No. 39023 SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2 427 Grand Avenue Oakland, CA 94610 CHAMBERS COPY 3 Telephone: (510) 893-6682 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation And Order For Dismissal Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL PAULICK DO NOT FILE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL PAULICK Plaintiff, V. ELISEO OAKS, L.P.; and DOES 1-25, Inclusive, Defendants. / CASE NO. C 09-04686 SBA Civil Rights STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL FRCP section 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Michael Paulick ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Eliseo Oaks, L.P.("Defendant"), by and through their attorneys of record, file this Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure section 41. Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on October 1, 2009. Plaintiff and Defendant have entered into a "Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement," which settles all aspects of the lawsuit against Defendant. A copy of the "Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement" is incorporated by reference herein as if set forth in full. The "Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement " states in part that "The court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Settlement Agreement, and this Settlement Agreement shall be incorporated by reference in the Dismissal as if set forth in full." Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate to the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the "Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement." Plaintiff moves to dismiss with prejudice the lawsuit against Defendant. Defendant, who has answered the complaint, agrees to the dismissal with prejudice. This case is not a class action, and no receiver has been appointed. This Stipulation and Order may be signed in counterparts, and facsimile or electronically transmitted signatures shall be as valid and as binding as original signatures. Wherefore, Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of record, so stipulate. Date: 2/12/10 SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION /s/ Sidney J. Cohen _____________________________ Sidney J. Cohen Attorney for Plaintiff Michael Paulick // Stipulation And Order For Dismissal -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: February 9, 1010 PARKER & CROSLAND LLP /s/ C. Royda Crosland C. Royda Crosland Attorney for Defendant Eliseo Oaks, L.P. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED: The lawsuit against Defendant is dismissed with prejudice. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties' "Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement." All disputes arising out of such agreement are REFERRED to the Chief Magistrate Judge or her designee for determination. Date: 2/16/10 Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge Stipulation And Order For Dismissal -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?