Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. DeviceVM et al

Filing 116

ORDER re 115 Granting Stipulation Re: Dismissal. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/27/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN (SBN 202634) [e-mail] BRYAN J. SINCLAIR (SBN 205885) [e-mail] MICHAEL R. HAVEN (SBN 208721) [e-mail] K&L GATES LLP 630 Hansen Way Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650.798.6701 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, vs. DEVICEVM, INC., a Delaware corporation, and BENEDICT CHONG, an individual, Defendants. DEVICEVM, a Delaware corporation,, Counter-Claimant, vs. PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD., a Delaware corporation, Counter-Defendant. Case No. 4:09-CV-04697-CW (EDL) STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken Room: 2, 4th Floor Complaint Filed: July 17, 2009 Trial Date: September 19, 2011

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: Dismissal - Case No. 4:09-CV-04697-CW (EDL)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action, including all claims and counterclaims, with prejudice in its entirety with each party bearing its own costs and fees. K&L GATES LLP

Dated: May 27, 2010

By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian Attorneys for Phoenix Technologies Ltd.

O'Melveny & Myers LLP Dated: May 27, 2010 By: /s/ David Enzminger Attorneys for DeviceVM, Inc.

ORDER Upon the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 27, 2010 By: Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Court Judge

1
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: Dismissal - Case No. 4:09-CV-04697-CW (EDL)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: May 27, 2010

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request.

By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian Attorneys for Phoenix Technologies Ltd.

2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: Dismissal - Case No. 4:09-CV-04697-CW (EDL)