L. v. Shoreline Unified School District

Filing 48

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 44 Motion for Leave to File; granting 46 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 5 D.L., a minor by and through his parents, K.L. and I.L., 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs. 8 SHORELINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 9 Defendant. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No: C 09-4753 SBA ORDER [Docket Nos. 44, 46] Presently before the Court is Defendant's Administrative Motion for Leave of Court to File Redacted Previously Removed Exhibits (Docket #25-1) and Plaintiff's Administrative Motion to Remove Defendant's Incorrectly Filed Documents - Docket 44, Attachment 2. Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendant's administrative motion arguing, inter alia, the Exhibits are considered Plaintiff's confidential education records pursuant to the Federal Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. 1232g, and should have been filed completely under seal. Defendant failed to file an opposition to Plaintiff's administrative motion. Having reviewed the papers filed in connections with these motions, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) Defendant's Administrative Motion for Leave of Court to File Redacted Previously Removed Exhibits (Docket #25-1) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling the Exhibits under seal in accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5; and (2) Plaintiff's Administrative Motion to Remove Defendant's Incorrectly Filed Documents - Docket 44, Attachment 2 is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 3, 2010 _______________________________ Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?