Banga v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Filing
116
ORDER. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 8/15/2013. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/10/2013. Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 10/17/2013 03:30 PM. Motions terminated: 113 MOTION to Continue and 115 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2013)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
OAKLAND DIVISION
6
7
KAMLESH BANGA,
Plaintiff,
8
9
Case No: C 09-04867 SBA
ORDER
vs.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
10 INC., and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive,
11
Defendants.
12
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the mandatory settlement conference, pretrial
13
14
15
16
17
conference, and trial dates are VACATED. The Court will reschedule, if necessary, the
time period to complete the mandatory settlement conference, the pretrial conference date,
the pretrial preparation deadlines, and the trial date following the resolution of Defendant's
motion for summary judgment. Dkt. 91.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a Case Management Conference is scheduled
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
for October 17, 2013 at 3:30 p.m. Prior to the date scheduled for the conference, the
parties shall meet and confer and prepare a joint Case Management Conference Statement.
Plaintiff is responsible for filing the joint statement no less than seven (7) days prior to the
conference date. The joint statement shall comply with the Standing Order for All Judges
of the Northern District of California and the Standing Orders of this Court. Plaintiff is
responsible for setting up the conference call, and on the specified date and time, shall call
(510) 637-3559 with all parties on the line.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated:
8/15/2013
________________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?