Banga v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Filing 52

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying as moot 40 Motion for Leave to File; denying as moot 25 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 OAKLAND DIVISION 6 7 8 KAMLESH BANGA, Plaintiff, 9 10 vs. Case No: C 09-04867 SBA ORDER Docket 25, 40 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 11 INC., and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, 12 Defendants. 13 14 On March 25, 2013, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's motion 15 for leave to file an amended complaint. Dkt. 49. On April 1, 2013, Plaintiff filed a first 16 amended complaint. Accordingly, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. 17 25) is DENIED as MOOT. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a surreply to Defendant's 18 motion for judgment on the pleadings is also DENIED as MOOT. This Order terminates 19 Docket 25 and Docket 40. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 4/11/13 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 BANGA et al, Plaintiff, 6 7 8 9 10 v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al, Defendant. / 11 12 Case Number: CV09-04867 SBA 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 14 15 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 16 17 18 That on April 11, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 19 20 21 22 23 Kamlesh Banga P.O. Box 6025 Vallejo, CA 94591 24 25 26 Dated: April 11, 2013 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Lisa Clark, Deputy Clerk 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?