Johnstone v. City of San Carlos et al

Filing 32

ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 2/5/2010. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. CITY OF SAN CARLOS, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ The court is in receipt of a letter filed by plaintiff's counsel, in which counsel notes that he inadvertently failed to include pages 11 and 12 in his opposition brief to defendant City of San Carlos and Jeff McCourtie's motion to dismiss. If plaintiff wishes pages 11 and 12 of his opposition to be taken into consideration by the court, plaintiff is hereby instructed to electronically file in the docket the missing pages to his opposition brief, as soon as possible and in any event no later than Monday, February 8. If defendant thereafter wishes to reply to any substantive argument raised in plaintiff's missing brief pages, defendant shall do so orally, at the hearing on the motions. MATTHEW JOHNSTONE, Plaintiff, No. C 09-4872 PJH ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 5, 2010 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge