Martin et al v. Geltech Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 42

ORDER re 40 granting FOURTH STIPULATION CHANGING TIME OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS MOTION TO TRANSFER OR STAY ACTION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/11/10. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

EDWARD F. McHALE (FL SBN 190300) McHALE & SLAVIN, P.A. 2855 PGA Boulevard Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] DAVID Z. RIBAKOFF (CA SBN 162925) THE PHAN LAW GROUP A Professional Law Corporation 6080 Center Drive, Suite 610 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant GelTech Solutions, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SUSAN P. MARTIN and DAVID E. NEAL, Plaintiffs, Case No. C09-04884 CW

ORDER CHANGING TIME OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR V. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' GELTECH SOLUTIONS, INC. and ROOTGEL MOTION TO TRANSFER OR STAY ACTION WEST [Civil L.R. 6-2] Defendants. [STIPULATION FILED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH]

STIPULATION Plaintiffs Susan P. Martin and David E. Neal ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant GelTech Solutions, Inc. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 for a an order changing the briefing schedule on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Plaintiff on December 11, 2009 (the "Motion for Summary Judgment"), as follows: Any reply in support of the Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed and served on or before March 4, 2010.
[PROPOSED] ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment was filed on February 4, 2010. Additionally, Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 for a an order changing the briefing schedule on Defendants' Motion to Transfer or Stay Action, filed by Plaintiff on December 7, 2009 (the "Motion to Transfer"), as follows: Any reply in support of the Motion shall be filed and served on or before March 4, 2010. Opposition to the Motion to Transfer was filed on February 4, 2010. This Stipulation is supported by the accompanying Declaration of Edward F. McHale, submitted in compliance with Civil L.R. 6-2(a). IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: February 11, 2010 ZIMMERMAN & CRONEN, LLP

By: /s/ Michael James Cronen______________ Michael James Cronen Attorneys for Plaintiffs Susan P. Martin and David E. Neal Dated: February 11, 2010 McHALE & SLAVIN, P.A.

By: /s/ Edward McHale______________________ Edward McHale Attorneys for Defendant GelTech Solutions, Inc.

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 11, 2010 _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER