Martin et al v. Geltech Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 45

ORDER re 43 granting STIPULATION CHANGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT GELTECH SOLUTIONS, INC.'S MOTION TO STAY OR TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 03/22/2010. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Michael James Cronen, Cal. State Bar No. 131087 ZIM M E RM A N & CRONEN, LLP 1330 Broadway, Suite 710 Oakland CA 94612-2506 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Susan P. Martin and David E. Neal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Susan P. Martin and David E. Neal, Plaintiffs, v.

14 15 16 17 18 19 Geltech Solutions, Inc. and RootGel West Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No: 09-CV-04884 CW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND DEFENDANT GELTTECH SOLUTIONS, INC.'S MOTION TO TRANSFER OR STAY ACTION [Civil L.R. 6-2] Date: No hearing scheduled Before: Hon. Judge Wilken

The parties hereto hereby stipulate, by and through their respective counsel of record, as 20 follows: 21 1. Plaintiffs' reply in support of Plaintiffs' Motion For Summary Judgment and 22 Defendant Geltech Solutions, Inc.'s reply in support of its Motion To Transfer Of Stay Action 23 in this matter are presently set for March 4, 2010. 24 2. The parties agree to change the time for the due dates for their respective replies to 25 March 25, 2010. 26 3. This request is not for purposes of delay but to provide the parties with sufficient 27 28
S t ip . & Prop Ord Re; B r i e f i n g Schedule

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

additional time to further discuss and explore possible settlement of their dispute and to engage in further settlement discussions toward this end. This stipulated request is accompanied by the Declaration Of Michael Cronen In Support Of Stipulation filed herewith in conformity with Civil L.R. 6-2(a) and incorporated herein by this reference. Respectfully submitted, Dated: March 1, 2010 ZIMMERMAN & CRONEN, LLP By: /s/ Michael James Cronen Michael James Cronen, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Susan P. Martin and David E. Neal Dated: March 1, 2010 THE PHAN LAW GROUP By: /s/David Z. Ribakoff David Z. Ribakoff, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Geltech Solutions, Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3/22/2010 Dated: _________________

_______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

S t ip . & Prop Ord Re; B r i e f i n g Schedule

2