Lewis v. Wells Fargo Bank

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re 32 Stipulation filed by Wells Fargo Bank. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/21/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2010)

Lewis v. Wells Fargo Bank

Doc. 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CAROLINE G. ALLEN (SBN 157377) [e-mail] 22 Battery Street, Suite 333 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorney for Plaintiff KAREN THERESA LEWIS

MALCOLM A. HEINICKE (SBN 194174) [e-mail] MARK R. CONRAD (SBN 255667) [e-mail] MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Karen Theresa Lewis, Plaintiff, vs. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Defendant.

CASE NO. CV-09-4890-PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION The Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

11859033.1

STIUPLATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; CV-09-4890-PJH
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, all parties have stipulated to the dismissal of the above captioned lawsuit; NOW, THEREFORE, good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS that the abovecaptioned lawsuit, and all claims asserted therein, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

I, Mark R. Conrad, attest that I have obtained concurrence from other counsel listed below in the filing of this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION. See N.D. Cal. Gen. Order 45 § 10(B). DATED: October 11, 2010 Caroline G. Allen, A Professional Corporation CAROLINE G. ALLEN

By:

/s/ Caroline G. Allen CAROLINE G. ALLEN

Attorney for Plaintiff KAREN THERESA LEWIS DATED: October 11, 2010 Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP MALCOLM A. HEINICKE MARK R. CONRAD

By:

/s/ Mark R. Conrad MARK R. CONRAD

Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
S DISTRICT TE C TA ____________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ED ORDER
FO
A
Judge P H hyllis J. amilton

UNIT ED

DATED: October 21 _____________, 2010

RT U O

S

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

C

11859033.1

-2-

STIUPLATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; CV-09-4890-PJH

LI

R NIA

O IT IS S

NO

RT

H