Lewis v. Wells Fargo Bank

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re 32 Stipulation filed by Wells Fargo Bank. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/21/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2010)

Download PDF
Lewis v. Wells Fargo Bank Doc. 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CAROLINE G. ALLEN (SBN 157377) caguzzetta@aol.com 22 Battery Street, Suite 333 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-1690 Facsimile: (415) 986-1699 Attorney for Plaintiff KAREN THERESA LEWIS MALCOLM A. HEINICKE (SBN 194174) Malcolm.Heinicke@mto.com MARK R. CONRAD (SBN 255667) Mark.Conrad@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Karen Theresa Lewis, Plaintiff, vs. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Defendant. CASE NO. CV-09-4890-PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION The Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 11859033.1 STIUPLATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; CV-09-4890-PJH Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, all parties have stipulated to the dismissal of the above captioned lawsuit; NOW, THEREFORE, good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS that the abovecaptioned lawsuit, and all claims asserted therein, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. I, Mark R. Conrad, attest that I have obtained concurrence from other counsel listed below in the filing of this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION. See N.D. Cal. Gen. Order 45 10(B). DATED: October 11, 2010 Caroline G. Allen, A Professional Corporation CAROLINE G. ALLEN By: /s/ Caroline G. Allen CAROLINE G. ALLEN Attorney for Plaintiff KAREN THERESA LEWIS DATED: October 11, 2010 Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP MALCOLM A. HEINICKE MARK R. CONRAD By: /s/ Mark R. Conrad MARK R. CONRAD Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. S DISTRICT TE C TA ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ED ORDER FO A Judge P H hyllis J. amilton UNIT ED DATED: October 21 _____________, 2010 RT U O S ER N F D IS T IC T O R C 11859033.1 -2- STIUPLATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; CV-09-4890-PJH LI R NIA O IT IS S NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?