Curry v. Hansen Medical, Inc. et al
Filing
162
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 157 Motion for PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
8
9
10
ROBERT CURRY, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
11
12
Plaintiff,
v.
13
14
15
HANSEN MEDICAL, INC., FREDERIC
H. MOLL, STEVEN M. VAN DICK,
GARY C. RESTANI, and CHRISTOPHER
SELLS
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
___________________________________
This Document Relates To:
ALL ACTIONS.
Lead Case No. 4:09-cv-05094-CW
ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND
PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
1
WHEREAS, a class action is pending before the Court entitled Curry v. Hansen
2
Medical, Inc., No. 4:09-cv-05094-CW, United States District Court for the Northern District of
3
California (the “Litigation”);
4
5
6
7
WHEREAS, the Court has received the Stipulation of Settlement dated May 9, 2013 (the
“Stipulation”),1 which has been entered into by the Plaintiffs and the Settling Defendants, and
the Court has reviewed the Stipulation and the Exhibits annexed thereto;
8
WHEREAS, the Settling Parties having made application, pursuant to Federal Rule of
9
Civil Procedure 23(e), for an order preliminarily approving the settlement of this Litigation, in
10
accordance with the Stipulation of Settlement which, together with the Exhibits annexed
11
thereto, sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed settlement of the Litigation and for
12
dismissal of the Litigation with prejudice upon the terms and conditions set forth therein; and
13
14
15
the Court having read and considered the Stipulation of Settlement and the Exhibits annexed
thereto;
16
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
17
1.
18
set forth therein, subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing described below.
19
20
The Court does hereby preliminarily approve the Stipulation and the Settlement
2.
The Court finds that: (a) the Stipulation resulted from arm’s-length negotiations;
and (b) the Settlement is sufficiently fair, reasonable and adequate as to the Class Members to
21
22
warrant providing notice of the Settlement to Class Members and holding a Settlement Hearing.
3.
23
The Settlement Hearing shall be held before this Court on November 21, 2013, at
24
2:00 p.m. (approximately 100 days from the Notice Date as defined in ¶ 8(a)), to determine
25
whether the proposed Settlement of the Litigation on the terms and conditions provided for in
26
27
28
1
For purposes of this Order, the Court adopts all defined terms as set forth in the Stipulation, and
the terms used herein shall have the same meaning as in the Stipulation.
[PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND
PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
Lead Case No. 4:09-cv-05094-CW
1
1
the Stipulation is fair, reasonable and adequate to the Class and should be approved by the
2
Court; whether a Judgment as provided in the Stipulation should be entered herein; whether the
3
proposed Plan of Allocation should be approved; whether to approve the Plaintiffs’ application
4
for their reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly relating to their
5
6
representation of the Class; and to determine the amount of fees and expenses that should be
7
awarded to counsel for Plaintiffs. The Court may adjourn the Settlement Hearing without
8
further notice to Members of the Class.
9
4.
Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court
10
preliminarily certifies, solely for the purposes of effectuating this Settlement, a Settlement Class
11
consisting of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded
12
common stock of Hansen between February 19, 2008 and October 18, 2009, inclusive, and were
13
14
allegedly damaged thereby. Excluded from the Class shall be the Settling Defendants and their
15
corporate affiliates, members of their immediate families, and their heirs, successors and
16
assigns, and any officers or directors of Hansen. There has been no prior notice to Class
17
Members of the certification of the Class in this Litigation or prior opportunity for any Person
18
or entity to request to be excluded from the Class.
19
20
5.
In preliminarily certifying this Settlement Class, the Court finds that the
Settlement Class appears to satisfy the requirements of Rules 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal
21
22
Rules of Civil Procedure in that: (a) the number of Class Members is so numerous that joinder
23
of all members thereof is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the
24
Class; (c) the claims of the Court appointed Class Representatives, Mina Farr and Nader Farr,
25
are typical of the claims of the Class they represent; (d) the Class Representatives have and will
26
continue to fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Class; (e) the questions of law
27
28
and fact common to the members of the Class predominate over any questions affecting only
[PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND
PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
Lead Case No. 4:09-cv-05094-CW
2
1
individual members of the Class; and (f) a class action is superior to other available methods for
2
the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.
3
4
6.
The Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice of Proposed Settlement
of Class Action, Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Settlement Fairness Hearing (the “Notice”), the
5
6
Proof of Claim and Release form (the “Proof of Claim”), and Summary Notice (“Summary
7
Notice”) annexed as Exhibits A-1, A-2 and A-3 to the Stipulation, and finds that the mailing and
8
distribution of the Notice and publishing of the Summary Notice substantially in the manner and
9
form set forth in this Order meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and
10
Due Process, and is the best notice practicable under the circumstances and shall constitute due
11
and sufficient notice to all Persons entitled thereto.
12
7.
Pending final determination by the Court as to whether the Settlement, as set
13
14
forth in the Stipulation, is fair, reasonable and adequate and should be finally approved and
15
whether the Judgment dismissing the Litigation with prejudice should be approved, no Class
16
Member, either directly, representatively or in any other capacity, shall assert, commence or
17
prosecute against any of the Settling Defendants or the Released Persons, any of the Released
18
Claims in this Litigation, or in any other proceeding or forum. This injunction is necessary to
19
20
protect and effectuate the settlement, this Order, and the Court’s flexibility and authority to
effectuate the settlement and to enter judgment when appropriate, and is ordered in aid of the
21
22
Court’s jurisdiction and to protect its judgments.
8.
23
The Court appoints Garden City Group (“Claims Administrator”) to supervise
24
and administer the notice procedure as well as the processing of claims as more fully set forth
25
below:
26
27
28
(a)
Not later than August 5, 2013 (the “Notice Date”), the Claims
Administrator shall cause a copy of the Notice and the Proof of Claim, substantially in
[PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND
PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
Lead Case No. 4:09-cv-05094-CW
3
1
the forms annexed as Exhibits A-1 and A-2 to the Stipulation of Settlement, to be mailed
2
by first class mail to all Class Members who can be identified with reasonable effort; the
3
Notice shall notify potential Class Members that the date of the Settlement Hearing is
4
subject to change and that any changes shall be posted on the settlement website;
5
(b)
6
Not later than August 5, 2013, the Claims Administrator shall cause the
7
Stipulation and its Exhibits and a copy of the Notice to be posted on the following
8
website: www.gcginc.com;
9
(c)
Not later than August 20, 2013, the Claims Administrator shall cause the
10
Summary Notice to be published once in Investor’s Business Daily, and on a different
11
day shall cause the Summary Notice to be published once in Globe Newswire; and
12
(d)
Not later than October 11, 2013, Lead Counsel shall cause to be served
13
14
on the Settling Defendants’ counsel and filed with the Court proof, by affidavit or
15
declaration, of such mailing, publishing and posting. Hansen shall, at its own cost,
16
provide transfer records to the Claims Administrator in an electronic format acceptable
17
to the Claims Administrator.
18
9.
19
20
Nominees who purchased or acquired Hansen common stock between
February 19, 2008 and October 18, 2009, inclusive, shall send the Notice and the Proof of
Claim to all beneficial owners of such Hansen common stock within twenty (20) days after
21
22
receipt thereof, or send a list of the names and addresses of such beneficial owners to the Claims
23
Administrator within twenty (20) days of receipt thereof, in which event the Claims
24
Administrator shall promptly mail the Notice and the Proof of Claim to such beneficial owners.
25
Lead Counsel shall, if requested, reimburse banks, brokerage houses or other nominees solely
26
for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing the Notice to beneficial
27
28
owners who are Class Members out of the Settlement Fund, which expenses would not have
[PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND
PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
Lead Case No. 4:09-cv-05094-CW
4
1
been incurred except for the sending of such Notice, subject to further order of this Court with
2
respect to any dispute concerning such compensation.
3
4
10.
Any Person falling within the definition of the Class may, upon request, be
excluded from the Class. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, for the request to be valid, any
5
6
such Person must submit to the Claims Administrator a request for exclusion (“Request for
7
Exclusion”), postmarked no later than October 25, 2013, which must state: (a) the name,
8
address, and telephone number of the Person requesting exclusion; (b) each of the Person’s
9
purchases and sales of Hansen common stock made during the Class Period, including the dates
10
of purchase or sale, the number of shares purchased and/or sold, and the price paid or received
11
per share for each such purchase or sale; and (c) that the Person wishes to be excluded from the
12
Class. All Persons who submit valid and timely Requests for Exclusion in the manner set forth
13
14
in this paragraph shall have no rights under the Settlement, shall not share in the distribution of
15
the Net Settlement Fund, and shall not be bound by the Settlement or the Judgment entered in
16
this Litigation.
17
18
19
20
11.
All Members of the Class (other than those Persons or entities who shall timely
and validly request exclusion from the Class) shall be bound by all determinations and
judgments in the Litigation concerning the settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable to the
Class.
21
22
12.
Class Members (other than those Persons or entities who shall timely and validly
23
request exclusion from the Class) who wish to collect in the settlement shall complete and
24
submit Proof of Claim forms in accordance with the instructions contained therein. Unless the
25
Court orders otherwise, all Proof of Claim forms must be postmarked no later than October 25,
26
2013. Any Class Member who does not timely submit a Proof of Claim within the time
27
28
provided for shall be barred from sharing in the distribution of the proceeds of the Net
[PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND
PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
Lead Case No. 4:09-cv-05094-CW
5
1
Settlement Fund, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
2
3
4
13.
Any Member of the Class may enter an appearance in the Litigation, at his, her
or its own expense, individually or through counsel of his, her or its own choice. If they do not
enter an appearance, Lead Counsel will represent them.
5
14.
6
Any Member of the Class (other than those Persons or entities who timely and
7
validly request exclusion from the Class) may appear and show cause, if he, she or it has any
8
reason, why the proposed settlement of the Litigation should or should not be approved as fair,
9
reasonable and adequate, why a Judgment should or should not be entered thereon, why the Plan
10
of Allocation should or should not be approved, or why attorneys’ fees and expenses should or
11
should not be awarded to Settling Class Action Plaintiffs’ Counsel or Plaintiffs; provided,
12
however, that no Class Member or any other Person shall be heard or entitled to contest the
13
14
approval of the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement, or, if approved, the Judgment
15
to be entered thereon approving the same, or the order approving the Plan of Allocation, or the
16
attorneys’ fees and expenses to be awarded to Settling Class Action Plaintiffs’ Counsel or
17
Plaintiffs, unless that Person has filed said objections, papers and briefs with the Clerk of the
18
United States District Court for the Northern District of California, no later than October 25,
19
20
2013, and delivered copies of any such papers to counsel identified in the Notice, such that they
are received on or before such date. Any Member of the Class who does not make his, her or its
21
22
23
objection in the manner provided shall be deemed to have waived such objection and shall
forever be foreclosed from making any such objection, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
15.
24
All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed and considered to be in
25
custodia legis of the Court, and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court, until such
26
time as such funds shall be distributed pursuant to the Stipulation or further order(s) of the
27
28
Court.
[PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND
PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
Lead Case No. 4:09-cv-05094-CW
6
1
16.
All papers in support of the settlement, the Plan of Allocation, Plaintiffs’
2
application for reimbursement of expenses, and the application for attorneys’ fees or expenses,
3
shall be filed and served not later than October 4, 2013.
4
This includes the parties’
“Supplemental Agreement” and any other terms of the settlement that were not disclosed in the
5
6
Stipulation of Settlement submitted to the Court with the motion for preliminary settlement
7
approval. Any papers in further support of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation and the
8
application for attorneys’ fees or expenses, including a lodestar figure and billing statements,
9
shall be filed and served no later than October 31, 2013. By this date, Plaintiffs’ counsel must
10
identify a specific nonprofit organization to receive any funds remaining in the settlement fund
11
after all class members have received payment. The organization’s mission must relate to the
12
subject matter of this lawsuit. If Plaintiffs’ counsel cannot identify such an organization, it may
13
14
15
provide instead that the remaining funds escheat to the United States.
17.
The Settling Defendants shall not have any responsibility for or liability with
16
respect to the Plan of Allocation or any application for attorneys’ fees or expenses submitted by
17
Lead Counsel, and such matters will be considered separately from the fairness, reasonableness
18
and adequacy of the Settlement.
19
20
18.
At or after the Settlement Hearing, the Court shall determine whether the Plan of
Allocation proposed by Plaintiffs and any application for attorneys’ fees or expenses shall be
21
22
23
approved.
19.
All reasonable expenses incurred in identifying and notifying Class Members, as
24
well as administering the Settlement Fund, shall be paid as set forth in the Stipulation. In the
25
event the Settlement is not approved by the Court, or otherwise fails to become effective,
26
neither the Plaintiffs nor Lead Counsel shall have any obligation to repay any amounts actually
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND
PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
Lead Case No. 4:09-cv-05094-CW
7
1
2
3
4
and properly disbursed from the Settlement Fund.
20.
Neither the Stipulation, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor any of the
negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be construed as an admission or concession
by the Settling Defendants of the truth of any of the allegations in the Litigation, or of any
5
6
liability, fault, or wrongdoing of any kind and shall not be construed as, or deemed to be
7
evidence of or an admission or concession that Plaintiffs or any Class Members have suffered
8
any damages, harm, or loss.
9
21.
In the event that the Settlement does not become effective in accordance with the
10
terms of the Stipulation of Settlement or the Effective Date does not occur, or in the event that
11
the Settlement Fund, or any portion thereof, is returned to the Settling Defendants, then this
12
Order shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the
13
14
Stipulation and shall be vacated and, in such event, all orders entered and Releases delivered in
15
connection herewith shall be null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the
16
Stipulation of Settlement.
17
18
19
20
22.
Pending the Settlement Hearing, the Court stays all proceedings in the Litigation,
other than proceedings necessary to carry out or enforce the terms and conditions of the
Stipulation.
23.
The Court reserves the right to adjourn the date of the Settlement Hearing
21
22
without further notice to the Members of the Class, and retains jurisdiction to consider all
23
further applications arising out of or connected with the Settlement. The Court may approve the
24
Settlement, with such modifications as may be agreed to by the Settling Parties, if appropriate,
25
without further notice to the Class.
26
7/25/2013
DATED: _______________
27
28
Hon. Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge
[PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND
PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
Lead Case No. 4:09-cv-05094-CW
8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?