Curry v. Hansen Medical, Inc. et al
Filing
99
ORDER Granting 98 Proposed Order re 97 Notice of Substitution of Counsel for Defendant Christopher Sells. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/24/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
SARAH A. GOOD (SBN 148742)
sarah.good@pillsburylaw.com
JEFFREY JACOBI (SBN 252884)
jeffrey.jacobi@pilslburylaw.com
50 Fremont Street
Post Office Box 7880
San Francisco, CA 94120-7880
Telephone: (415) 983-1000
Facsimile: (415) 983-1200
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant
CHRISTOPHER SELLS
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
HANSEN MEDICAL, INC., FREDERIC H. )
MOLL, STEVEN M. VAN DICK, GARY C. )
RESTANI, and CHRISTOPHER SELLS,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
ROBERT CURRY, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
No. 4:09-cv-05094-CW
CLASS ACTION
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR
DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER SELLS
19
20
Upon review of the Notice of Substitution of Counsel submitted by Christopher
21
Sells, Defendant in the above-referenced matter, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
22
Sarah A. Good and Jeffrey Jacobi of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP shall serve as
23
attorneys of record for Defendant Christopher Sells. Jeremy T. Kamras, Emily H. Wood
24
and John T. Yow of the law firm of Arnold & Porter LLP are relieved as counsel for the
25
Defendant.
26
27
28
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER SELLS
Case No. 5:09-cv-05094-CW
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated:
5/24/2012
.
3
4
5
Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER SELLS
Case No. 5:09-cv-05094-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?