Curry v. Hansen Medical, Inc. et al

Filing 99

ORDER Granting 98 Proposed Order re 97 Notice of Substitution of Counsel for Defendant Christopher Sells. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/24/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP SARAH A. GOOD (SBN 148742) sarah.good@pillsburylaw.com JEFFREY JACOBI (SBN 252884) jeffrey.jacobi@pilslburylaw.com 50 Fremont Street Post Office Box 7880 San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 Telephone: (415) 983-1000 Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant CHRISTOPHER SELLS 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) HANSEN MEDICAL, INC., FREDERIC H. ) MOLL, STEVEN M. VAN DICK, GARY C. ) RESTANI, and CHRISTOPHER SELLS, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ROBERT CURRY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, No. 4:09-cv-05094-CW CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER SELLS 19 20 Upon review of the Notice of Substitution of Counsel submitted by Christopher 21 Sells, Defendant in the above-referenced matter, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 22 Sarah A. Good and Jeffrey Jacobi of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP shall serve as 23 attorneys of record for Defendant Christopher Sells. Jeremy T. Kamras, Emily H. Wood 24 and John T. Yow of the law firm of Arnold & Porter LLP are relieved as counsel for the 25 Defendant. 26 27 28 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER SELLS Case No. 5:09-cv-05094-CW 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: 5/24/2012 . 3 4 5 Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER SELLS Case No. 5:09-cv-05094-CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?