Fuentes v. County of Napa et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 12/14/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2010)

Fuentes v. County of Napa et al

Doc. 19

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Kimberly E. Colwell, Esq. (SBN: 127604) [e-mail] Kevin E. Gilbert, Esq. (SBN: 209236) [e-mail] MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 555 12th Street, Suite 1500 Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF NAPA, CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, AMERICAN CANYON POLICE OFFICERS NICOL DUDLEY, CHRIS ROBERTS, GEOFFREY ROCHESTER and SERGEANT MIKE COLLINS Andrew C. Schwartz, Esq. (SBN: 64578) [e-mail] Nick Casper, Esq. (SBN: 244637) [e-mail] CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK 2121 North California Blvd., Suite 1020 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorney for Plaintiff MARIA BELEN FUENTES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARIA BELEN FUENTES, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF NAPA; CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON; AMERICAN CANYON POLICE OFFICERS NICOL DUDLEY, CHRIS ROBERTS, ROCHESTER, and SERGEANT COLLINS, sued in their individual capacities and as employees of Napa County and City of American Canyon; and DOES ONE through THIRTY, Defendants. Case No: C 09-05122 SBA STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER

Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice; [Proposed] Order [C09-05122 SBA]
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiff MARIA BELEN FUENTES and Defendants COUNTY OF NAPA, CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, AMERICAN CANYON POLICE OFFICERS NICOL DUDLEY, CHRIS ROBERTS, GEOFFREY ROCHESTER and SERGEANT MIKE COLLINS, by and through their counsel of record, respectfully submit the present Stipulation dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint in Case No. C09-05122 SBA. The parties further agree that Plaintiff and Defendants shall bear their own costs associated with the maintenance and defense of Case No. C09-05122 SBA. THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Dismissal with prejudice. Plaintiff MARIA BELEN FUENTES dismisses with

prejudice her Complaint in Case No. C09-05122 SBA captioned "MARIA BELEN FUENTES, Plaintiff v. COUNTY OF NAPA; CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON; AMERICAN CANYON POLICE OFFICERS NICOL DUDLEY, CHRIS ROBERTS, ROCHESTER, and SERGEANT COLLINS, sued in their individual capacities and as employees of Napa County and City of American Canyon; and DOES ONE through THIRTY," presently pending before this Court. 2. Costs. Plaintiff and Defendants shall bear their own costs and fees incurred in the

prosecution and defense of Case No. C09-05122 SBA. In no event shall any party to Case No. C0905122 SBA be entitled to recover from or be required to pay to any adverse party fees, costs, or any other remuneration emanating out of this action as a result of the instigation, prosecution, defense or dismissal with prejudice of Case No. C09-05122 SBA. IT IS SO STIPULATED Dated: December 9, 2010 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON By: Kevin E. Gilbert Attorney for Defendants

Dated: December 9, 2010

CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK By: Nick Casper, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff

1 Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice; [Proposed] Order [C09-05122 SBA]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1559987_1.DOC

ORDER Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation, Plaintiff's Complaint on file herein is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each side to bear its own costs/fees. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: 12/14/10 HONORABLE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

2 Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice; [Proposed] Order [C09-05122 SBA]