Abstrax, Inc. v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Filing 195

STIPULATION AND ORDER ON BRIEFING DATES FOR DISCOVERY MOTIONS re 193 Stipulation filed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/3/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2010)

1 Gregory S. Dovel (State Bar No. 135387) [e-mail] 2 Jeff Eichmann (State Bar No. 227472) [e-mail] 3 DOVEL & LUNER, LLP 4 201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600 Santa Monica, California 90401 5 [phone] [phone] fax 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 7 Abstrax, Inc. 8 9 10 11 12 13 Thomas M. Dunham (pro hac vice ) [e-mail] J. Michael Woods (pro hac vice) [e-mail] Howrey LLP 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004-2402 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

14 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterplaintiff Sun Microsystems, Inc. 15 16 [additional counsel on the next page] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 vs. ABSTRAX INC., Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C-09-5243-PJH STIPULATION ON BRIEFING DATES FOR DISCOVERY MOTIONS Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

25 SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., 26 27 28
Case No. C-09-5243-PJH STIPULATION ON BRIEFING DATES FOR DISCOVERY MOTIONS

Defendant.

1 Irene Yang (SBN 245464) [e-mail] 2 HOWREY LLP 525 Market Street, Suite 3600 3 San Francisco, California 94105 4 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. C-09-5243-PJH STIPULATION ON BRIEFING DATES FOR DISCOVERY MOTIONS

2

1

Pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 1 (Dkt. No. 190), dated April 9, 2010, Defendant Sun

2 Microsystems, Inc. ("Sun") and Plaintiff Abstrax, Inc. ("Abstrax") stipulate to the briefing 3 schedule below for the parties' motions related to CDT discovery and respectfully request that 4 the Court enter an Order accordingly: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 · · · · May 24, 2010 ­ June 7, 2010 ­ · May 10, 2010 ­ Sun files revised motion for a protective order and Abstrax files revised motion to compel production regarding CDT discovery. Each party files its opposition brief. Each party files its reply brief.

The parties will not seek to file sur-replies. The parties will attend mediation within 30 days after the Court's ruling on these discovery motions. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, HOWREY LLP

14 Dated: April 28, 2010 15 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: April 28, 2010 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. C-09-5243-PJH STIPULATION ON BRIEFING DATES FOR DISCOVERY MOTIONS

By: /s/Irene Yang Irene Yang Attorneys for Defendant SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC. DOVEL & LUNER, LLP

By: /s/John Jeffrey Eichmann John Jeffrey Eichmann Attorneys for Plaintiff ABSTRAX, INC.

1 2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. C-09-5243-PJH STIPULATION ON BRIEFING DATES FOR DISCOVERY MOTIONS

UNIT ED

S

May 3 3 Dated: _________________, 2010

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

2

A

C

LI

FO

Ju

llis J. H dge Phy

amilton

R NIA

DE Hon. Phyllis J. RE SO OR Hamilton IS States District Court Judge IT United

D

RT U O

NO

RT

H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CERTIFICATION BY IRENE YANG PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE. NO. 45, SECTION X, RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California, and an

associate in the law firm of Howrey LLP, counsel for defendant Sun Microsystems, Inc. The statements herein are made on my personal knowledge and if called as a witness I could and would testify thereto. 2. The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that

concurrence has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared document with the Court. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 28th day of April, 2010, at San Francisco, California. /s/ Irene Yang Irene Yang

Case No. C-09-5243-PJH STIPULATION ON BRIEFING DATES FOR DISCOVERY MOTIONS