Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. NBC General Contractors Corporation et al

Filing 71

ORDER re 68 Order. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/25/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, ) a Connecticut corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) NBC GENERAL CONTRACTORS ) CORPORATION, a California Corporation, et ) al., ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. C09-05363 SBA ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Docket 53, 54, 65) 17 18 19 Pursuant to the Court’s Order of Reference (Docket 57), Magistrate Judge James Larson 20 issued a Report and Recommendation in which he granted Plaintiff’s application for writ of 21 attachment and temporary protective order with regard to Defendant Monica Ung (Docket 53, 54). 22 (Docket 65.) Although no objections have been filed, this Court reviews Magistrate Judge 23 Larson’s legal conclusions de novo. See Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 24 (9th Cir. 1983). Upon such review, the Court finds no error in Magistrate Judge Larson’s Report 25 and Recommendation. Accordingly, 26 // 27 // 28 // -1[PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS AND AMENDING JUDGMENT Case No. C09-05363 SBA 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Magistrate Judge Larson’s Report and 2 Recommendation (Docket 65) is ACCEPTED and shall become the Order of this Court. This 3 Order terminates Docket 53, 54. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: May 25, 2011 ______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS AND AMENDING JUDGMENT Case No. C09-05363 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?