Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. NBC General Contractors Corporation et al
Filing
71
ORDER re 68 Order. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/25/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, )
a Connecticut corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NBC GENERAL CONTRACTORS
)
CORPORATION, a California Corporation, et )
al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No. C09-05363 SBA
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(Docket 53, 54, 65)
17
18
19
Pursuant to the Court’s Order of Reference (Docket 57), Magistrate Judge James Larson
20
issued a Report and Recommendation in which he granted Plaintiff’s application for writ of
21
attachment and temporary protective order with regard to Defendant Monica Ung (Docket 53, 54).
22
(Docket 65.) Although no objections have been filed, this Court reviews Magistrate Judge
23
Larson’s legal conclusions de novo. See Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206
24
(9th Cir. 1983). Upon such review, the Court finds no error in Magistrate Judge Larson’s Report
25
and Recommendation. Accordingly,
26
//
27
//
28
//
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS AND AMENDING
JUDGMENT
Case No. C09-05363 SBA
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Magistrate Judge Larson’s Report and
2
Recommendation (Docket 65) is ACCEPTED and shall become the Order of this Court. This
3
Order terminates Docket 53, 54.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
Dated: May 25, 2011
______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS AND AMENDING
JUDGMENT
Case No. C09-05363 SBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?