Vidal v. Specialty Restaurant Corporation

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONSENTING to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Specialty Restaurant Corporation, Guillermo Vidal.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 4/21/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 John M. Cowden (State Bar No. 224963) JACKSON LEWIS LLP 199 Fremont Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 394-9400 Facsimile: (415) 394-9401 Attorneys for Defendant SPECIALTY RESTAURANT CORPORATION Josh S. Brownstein (State Bar No. 209760) Mark C. Thomas (State Bar No. 215580) BROWNSTEIN THOMAS LLP 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 940 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 986-1338 Facsimile: (415) 986-1231 Attorneys for Plaintiff GUILLERMO VIDAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION GUILLERMO VIDAL, an individual, Plaintiff, v. SPECIALTY RESTAURANT CORPORATION, a California corporation, Defendant. Case No. CV 09 5414 SBA JOINT STIPULATION FOR REASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE Complaint Filed: Trial Date: November 17, 2009 Not Yet Set 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to U.S.D.C. - Northern District Local Rule 73-1(b), plaintiff Guillermo Vidal ("plaintiff") and defendant Specialty Restaurant Corporation ("defendant") jointly stipulate to reassignment for all purposes to Magistrate Judge Edward Chen. Date: April 20, 2010 JACKSON LEWIS LLP John M. Cowden Attorneys for Defendant SPECIALTY RESTAURANT CORPORATION Date: April __, 2010 BROWNSTEIN THOMAS LLP __________________________________ Mark C. Thomas Josh S. Brownstein Attorneys for Plaintiff GUILLERMO VIDAL IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 4/21/10 __________________________________ Judge Saundra B. Armstrong U.S.D.C. Northern District Joint Stip for Reassignment for Magistrate Judge Case No. CV 09 5414 SBA 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?