Madsen v. Risenhoover et al
Filing
104
ORDER re 73 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Claire P. Williams, Donna K. Alpaugh, Sue E. Risenhoover, M. McLean, Michael Sayre. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/10/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RICK MADSEN,
4
5
6
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
v.
No. C 09-05457 SBA (PR)
ORDER PROVIDING RAND
SUMMARY JUDGMENT NOTICE
SUE E. RISENHOOVER, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________________/
A recent decision from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals requires that pro se prisoner-
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
plaintiffs be given "notice of what is required of them in order to oppose" summary judgment
11
motions at the time of filing of the motions, rather than when the district court orders service of
12
process or, otherwise, before the motions are filed. Woods v. Carey, No. 09-15548, slip op. 7871,
13
7874 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012). Accordingly, this Court now provides the following notice to Plaintiff
14
for his information in connection with Defendants' pending motion for summary judgment:
15
The defendants have made a motion for summary judgment by which they
seek to have your case dismissed. A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for
summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is
no genuine issue of material fact -- that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact
that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary
judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case.
When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly
supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on
what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations,
depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in
Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant's declarations and
documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you
do not submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate,
may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted [in favor of the
defendants], your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial.
See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc).
As Plaintiff's opposition deadline for the pending motion for summary judgment is
July 25, 2012, he has ample time to prepare his opposition taking into account this Rand summary
1
judgment notice (which repeats the Rand summary judgment notice provided in the Court's March
2
31, 2011 Order at pages 10-11). No adjustment of the briefing schedule is necessary.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
7/10/12
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.09\Madsen5457.RandNotice.wpd
2
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RICK MADSEN,
Case Number: CV09-05457 SBA
4
5
6
7
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
SUE E. RISENHOOVER et al,
Defendant.
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on July 12, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
13
14
15
16
17
18
Rick Madsen E10400
Pelican Bay State Prison
P.O. Box 7500
5905 Lake Earl Drive
Crescent City, CA 95531
Dated: July 12, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Lisa Clark, Deputy Clerk
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.09\Madsen5457.RandNotice.wpd
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?