Madsen v. Risenhoover et al
Filing
154
ORDER Re Attendance of CDCR Representative at Settlement Conference. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
EUREKA DIVISION
8
9
RICK MADSEN,
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
v.
12
No. C 4:09-5457 SBA (NJV)
ORDER RE ATTENDANCE OF
CDCR REPRESENTATIVE AT
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN
PRO SE PRISONER EARLY
SETTLEMENT PROGRAM
SUE E. RISENHOOVER, et al.,
13
14
Defendants.
___________________________________/
15
16
The court has been informed that this case has been included in the pilot program recently
17
initiated by the California State Attorney General's Office. Accordingly, the legal representative of the
18
CDCR is HEREBY EXCUSED from attendance at both the meet and confer and the settlement
19
conference previously ordered in this matter.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: May 17, 2013
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
EUREKA DIVISION
5
6
RICK MADSEN,
No. C 4:09-5457 SBA (NJV)
7
Plaintiff,
8
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
9
SUE E. RISENHOOVER, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Defendants.
___________________________________/
12
13
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on May 17, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy of
14
the attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed below,
15
by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail.
16
17
18
19
20
Rick Madsen
E10400
PO Box 7500
Pelican Bay State Prison
5905 Lake Earl Drive
Crescent City, CA 95531
21
22
____________________________________
23
Linn Van Meter
Administrative Law Clerk to
the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?