Brilliant Instruments, Inc. v. GuideTech, Inc.
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING DEFENDANTS 140 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2011)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRILLIANT INSTRUMENTS, INC.,
FOR LEAVE TO FILE
A MOTION FOR
(Docket No. 140)
GUIDETECH, INC. and RONEN SIGURA,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 09-05517 CW
AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
Defendants GuideTech LLC and Ronen Sigura move for leave to
file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s August 11, 2011
Order on Claim Construction, Granting Brilliant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Denying as Moot
GuideTech’s Motion for Summary Adjudication on the Issue of
failure by the Court to consider material facts and dispositive
legal arguments in its August 11 Order.
Defendants contend that there was a manifest
See Civ. L.R. 7-9(3).
Having considered Defendants’ papers, the Court DENIES their
motion for leave.
G. West’s report and the BI200 Datasheet cited by Defendants were
considered by the Court when it ruled on Brilliant’s motion for
(Docket No. 140.)
The portions of Dr. Burnell
The Clerk shall enter judgment forthwith and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?