Brilliant Instruments, Inc. v. GuideTech, Inc.

Filing 141

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING DEFENDANTS 140 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2011)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

BRILLIANT INSTRUMENTS, INC.,

5
6
7
8

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE
A MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
(Docket No. 140)

v.
GUIDETECH, INC. and RONEN SIGURA,
Defendants.

9

________________________________/

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

No. C 09-05517 CW

AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
________________________________/

11
12

Defendants GuideTech LLC and Ronen Sigura move for leave to

13

file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s August 11, 2011

14

Order on Claim Construction, Granting Brilliant’s Motion for

15

Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Denying as Moot

16

GuideTech’s Motion for Summary Adjudication on the Issue of

17

Assignor Estoppel.

18

failure by the Court to consider material facts and dispositive

19

legal arguments in its August 11 Order.

20

Defendants contend that there was a manifest

See Civ. L.R. 7-9(3).

Having considered Defendants’ papers, the Court DENIES their

21

motion for leave.

22

G. West’s report and the BI200 Datasheet cited by Defendants were

23

considered by the Court when it ruled on Brilliant’s motion for

24

summary judgment.

(Docket No. 140.)

The portions of Dr. Burnell

25

The Clerk shall enter judgment forthwith and close the file.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: 9/6/2011

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge