Brilliant Instruments, Inc. v. GuideTech, Inc.

Filing 203

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ORDERING THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A COURT EXPERT SHOULD NOT BE APPOINTED. Case Management Statement due by 6/12/2013. Case Management Conference set for 6/19/2013 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/3/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2013)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 BRILLIANT INSTRUMENTS, INC., 5 6 No. C 09-5517 CW Plaintiff, v. 7 GUIDETECH, LLC, 8 Defendant. ________________________________/ 9 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ORDERING THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A COURT EXPERT SHOULD NOT BE APPOINTED The Court sets a case management conference in the above10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California captioned case for Wednesday, June 19, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. The 11 parties shall file a joint case management statement by Wednesday, 12 June 12, 2013, in which they address, among other things, proposed 13 trial dates, anticipated trial length and an alternative dispute 14 resolution (ADR) plan. 15 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 706, the Court ORDERS 16 the parties to show cause why an expert witness should not be 17 appointed to testify regarding the technical issues in this case. 18 The parties shall meet and confer on the appointment and identity 19 of a court-appointed expert. By June 5, 2013, they shall file a 20 joint letter brief responding to the order to show cause, in which 21 they identify any proposed experts upon whom they agree. If they 22 are unable to reach agreement on the identity of an expert, they 23 shall set forward their separate proposed candidates, including 24 their qualifications to serve in this capacity. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: 5/3/2013 28 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?