Depomed, Inc. v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Filing 140

STIPULATION AND ORDER CHANGING TIME re 137 Stipulation, filed by Depomed, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/12/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2012)

1

7

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
WILLIAM G. GAEDE, III (136184)
[e-mail]
TERRY W. AHEARN (216543)
[e-mail]
BRYAN K. JAMES (260753)
[e-mail]
SHANE G. SMITH (272630)
[e-mail]
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

8

Attorneys for DEPOMED, INC.

2
3
4
5
6

9

11
12
SILICON VALLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

13
14

DURIE TANGRI LLP
DARALYN J. DURIE (SBN 169825)
[e-mail]
SONALI D. MAITRA (SBN 254896)
[e-mail]
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-236-6300

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP
WILLIAM A. RAKOCZY (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
PAUL J. MOLINO (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
RACHEL PERNIC WALDRON (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
HEINZ J. SALMEN (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
6 West Hubbard Street, Suite 500
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 312-222-6321

23
24
25

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants LUPIN
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and LUPIN LIMITED

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

27

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

28

OAKLAND DIVISION
Stipulated Request for Order Changing Time and
Request for Telephone Conference

CASE NO. C-09-5587 PJH

1

DEPOMED, INC., a California Corporation,

2

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,

3
4

Case No. C-09-5587 (PJH)
ELECTRONIC CASE FILING

v.

5

LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a
Virginia Corporation, and LUPIN LIMITED, an
Indian Corporation,

6

Defendants and Counter-Claimants.

7
8
9
10
11
12
SILICON VALLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
ORDER CHANGING TIME AND
REQUEST FOR TELEPHONE
CONFERENCE WITH
HONORABLE JUDGE HAMILTON

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

WHEREAS, by order dated November 2, 2011, the Court set a Pretrial Schedule;
WHEREAS, the parties have been granted an extension of the Pretrial Schedule by Order
dated November 2, 2011;
WHEREAS, the requested time modifications will not effect on the Court’s previous
Order (Dkt. No. 126) requiring 120 days between dispositive motions hearing date and trial date;
WHEREAS, Lupin has informed Depomed that it must travel to India to take the
depositions of the Lupin witnesses noticed for deposition by Depomed;
WHEREAS, counsel for Depomed has been unable, despite its efforts, to secure all
necessary travel documents and office space for these depositions in India before the close of fact
discovery on January 20, 2012; and
WHEREAS, it may be necessary for Lupin to take the deposition of certain Depomed
witnesses after the close of fact discovery;
THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, and subject to the approval of this Court, the
parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that:
The Pretrial Schedule be amended as follows:
Event
Date
Close of Fact Discovery;
January 20, 2012
Summary Disclosure of Experts
and Issues on Which Expert
Reports will be Proffered
Expert Reports on Issue Party
Bears Burden of Proof;
Any Affirmative Expert Report

January 27, 2012

Proposed Date
January 27, 2012

February 3, 2012

28
Stipulated Request for Order Changing Time and
Request for Telephone Conference

-2-

CASE NO. C-09-5587 PJH

1

Rebuttal Expert Reports

2

Close of Expert Discovery

3

L/D File Dispositive Motions

4
5
6

February 17, 2012

February 24, 2012

March 12, 2012

March 15, 2012

March 19, 2012

Same

Opposition Briefs to Dispositive
Motions

April 4, 2012

Same

Reply Briefs to Dispositive
Motions

April 11, 2012

Same

April 25, 2012
September 13, 2012

Same

7
8
9

Pretrial Conference
Trial (up to 5 Days)

11

(by Court Order)
October 15, 2012
(second place position)

Same
Same

12
SILICON VALLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

Dispositive Motions Hearing

13

Dated: January 9, 2012

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

14
By:

15
16
17
18

/s/ Terry W. Ahearn
William G. Gaede, III
Terry W. Ahearn
Bryan K. James
Shane G. Smith
Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterDefendant
Depomed, Inc.

19
20
21
Dated: January 9, 2012

DURIE TANGRI LLP

22
23
By:
24
25

/s/ Daralyn J. Durie
Daralyn J. Durie
Sonali D. Maitra

26
27
28
Stipulated Request for Order Changing Time and
Request for Telephone Conference

-3-

CASE NO. C-09-5587 PJH

1

RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK
LLP

2
3

By:

4
5

/s/ Rachel Pernic Waldron
William A. Rakoczy
Paul J. Molino
Rachel Pernic Waldron
Heinz J. Salmen

6
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. a
Virginia corporation, and LUPIN LIMITED, an
Indian corporation

7
8
9

11

FILER’S ATTESTATION

12
13
14
15

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B) regarding signatures, I, Terry W. Ahearn, attest
that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
Dated: January 9, 2012

16
17

/s/ Terry W. Ahearn

18

Terry W. Ahearn

19
20

[PROPOSED]ORDER

21
22
23

Upon stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Further, a telephone conference is hereby ORDERED for __________________

24
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

1/12/12
Dated: ______, 2012

S

RT

ER

H

Stipulated Request for Order Changing Time and
Request for Telephone Conference

-4-

n
Hamilto
hyllis J.

FO

NO

28

Judge P

LI

27

R NIA

Honorable Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton
ERED
O ORD
United States District Court Judge
IT IS S

26

A

25

UNIT
ED

SILICON VALLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

N

D

OF

C

I S T NO.
CASER I C T C-09-5587 PJH

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2
3
4

I certify that all counsel of record is being served on January 9, 2012, with a copy of this
document via the Court’s CM/ECF system.

5
6

Dated: January 9, 2012

7
/s/ Terry W. Ahearn

8

Terry W. Ahearn

9

11
12
SILICON VALLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

DM_US 31301126-2.082221.0015

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulated Request for Order Changing Time and
Request for Telephone Conference

-5-

CASE NO. C-09-5587 PJH