Depomed, Inc. v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Filing 62

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT re 61 Stipulation filed by Depomed, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/20/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2010)

Depomed, Inc. v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Doc. 62

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP WILLIAM G. GAEDE, III (136184) [e-mail] TERRANCE P. MCMAHON (071910) [e-mail] ANDREW A. KUMAMOTO (178541) [e-mail] 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Depomed, Inc. RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP PAUL J. MOLINO (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] WILLIAM A. RAKOCZY (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] THEODORE J. CHIACCHO (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] HEINZ J. SALMEN (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] 6 West Hubbard Street, Suite 500 Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] DURIE TANGRI LLP DARALYN DURIE (169825) [e-mail] SONALI MAITRA (254896) [e-mail] 332 Pine Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Lupin Ltd.

11
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW

12
S I L I C O N VALLEY

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEPOMED, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Virginia Corporation, and LUPIN LIMITED, an Indian Corporation, Defendants. No. 09-CV-05587 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION AND DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES RELATED TO U.S. PATENT NO. 6,723,340
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE M/AMEND CASE NO. 09-CV-05587 PJH
Dockets.Justia.com

DM_US 26401615-1.082221.0015

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend the Complaint and Dismiss Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action, Defendants' Third and Fourth Counterclaims and Defendants' Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Affirmative Defenses Related to U.S. Patent No. 6,723,340 on August 2, 2010; WHEREAS, the hearing on Plaintiff's above-referenced motion is presently set for September 8, 2010, at 9:00 in Courtroom 3 of the above-referenced Court; WHEREAS, Defendants' opposition and Plaintiff's reply memorandum are presently due August 18, 2010, and August 25, 2010, respectively; WHEREAS, due to scheduling conflict on Plaintiff's part, counsel has conferred and agreed that the hearing date should be rescheduled to September 15, 2010, and the briefing schedule amended; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, as follows: 1. The date on which Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint and Dismiss

11
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW

12
S I L I C O N VALLEY

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action, Defendants' Third and Fourth Counterclaims and Defendants' Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Affirmative Defenses Related to U.S. Patent No. 6,723,340 be heard be rescheduled to September 15, 2010, at 9:00a.m. in Courtroom 3 before the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton; 2. 3. The date for filing Defendants' opposition be extended to August 25, 2010; and The date for filing Plaintiff's reply be extended to September 1, 2010.

SO STIPULATED this 18th day of August 2010. MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP

By:

/s/ William G. Gaede, III William G. Gaede, III Attorneys for Depomed, Inc.

By:

/s/ Paul J. Molino Paul J. Molino Attorneys for Lupin Limited and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

DM_US 26401615-1.082221.0015

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE M/AMEND CASE NO. 09-CV-05587 PJH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order 45.X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence has been obtained from Paul Molino indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. /s/ William G. Gaede, III William G. Gaede, III

-oOoPURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 8/20/10

11
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW

UNIT ED

S I L I C O N VALLEY

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DM_US 26401615-1.082221.0015

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE M/AMEND CASE NO. 09-CV-05587 PJH

A

C

LI

FO

12

Judge P

H hyllis J.

amilton

R NIA

HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United SO ORDERED States District Court Judge IT IS
RT U O
S
NO

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT

H