Allyn v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
86
ORDER re 79 MOTION to Continue Briefing Schedule on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Charlotte Chapman Allyn, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 79 MOTION to Continue Briefing Schedule on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, 80 MOTION for Summ ary Judgment. Plaintiff's motion due by 10/14/11. Responses by both parties due by 10/28/2011. Replies by both parties due by 11/4/2011. Cross-Motions Hearing set for 1/31/2012 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/12/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
OAKLAND DIVISION
9
10 CHARLOTTE CHAPMAN ALLYN,
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
Case No: C 09-5671 SBA
ORDER
Docket 79, 82
13 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On September 6, 2011, pro se Plaintiff Charolette Chapman Allyn (“Plaintiff”) filed
a document entitled “Stipulation for Continuance of Briefing Schedule on Cross-Motion for
Summary Judgment.” Dkt. 79, 82. A review of the document reveals that it is not a
stipulation, but a request by Plaintiff to continue the hearing date and briefing schedule
with regard to the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The Court has previously
granted a continuance. Moreover, the Court notes that Defendant has filed its motion for
summary judgment in accordance with this Court’s prior orders. Dkt. 80. However, in
light of Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court will grant her an extension with the warning that
no further extensions will be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the hearing date for the parties’ cross-motions
for summary judgment, including Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 80),
shall be continued from October 13, 2011 to the next available hearing date of January 31,
1
2012. Plaintiff shall file her opening brief of no more than twenty (20) pages by no later
2
than October 14, 2011; the parties shall file their opposition briefs of no more than (20)
3
pages by no later than October 28, 2011; and the parties shall file their replies of no more
4
than ten (10) pages by no later than November 4, 2011. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
5
Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court, in its discretion, may resolve the
6
motion without oral argument. The parties are advised to check the Court’s website to
7
determine whether a court appearance is required. This Order terminates Docket Nos. 79,
8
82.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated: September 12, 2011
_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
CHARLOTTE CHAPMAN ALLYN,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
v.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE et al,
Defendant.
/
9
10
Case Number: CV09-05671 SBA
11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
12
13
14
15
16
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on September 13, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
17
18
19
Charlotte Chapman Allyn
P.O. Box 2026
Napa, CA 94558
20
21
Dated: September 13, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
22
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?