Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 13

Second STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Google Inc.. (Ezgar, Geoffrey) (Filed on 1/22/2010) Modified on 1/25/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Doc. 13

Case4:09-cv-05718-SBA Document13

Filed01/22/10 Page1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TIMOTHY T. SCOTT (SBN 126971/[e-mail]) GEOFFREY M. EZGAR (SBN 184243/[e-mail]) LEO SPOONER III (SBN 241541/[e-mail]) KING & SPALDING LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. Adrian M. Pruetz (Bar No. 118215/[e-mail]) Erica J. Pruetz (Bar No. 227712/[e-mail]) PRUETZ LAW GROUP LLP 200 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 1525 El Segundo, CA 90245 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Enoch H. Liang (Bar No. 212324/[e-mail]) Steven R. Hansen (Bar No. 198401/[e-mail]) LEE TRAN & LIANG APLC 601 S. Figueroa St., Suite 4025 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff NETLIST, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NETLIST, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC. Defendant. Case No. 09-cv-05718-SBA SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CIVIL ACTION NO. CV 09-05718

Dockets.Justia.com

Case4:09-cv-05718-SBA Document13

Filed01/22/10 Page2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Netlist, Inc. ("Netlist") and Defendant Google Inc. ("Google") file this Second Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint in this action. The parties have a mutual interest in the orderly and efficient conduct of this litigation, and they agree that this second extension of time will assist the parties in formulating their pleadings and responses in the present action. In particular, Google is in the process of

substituting counsel in this action from Shelley K. Mack at the law firm of Fish & Richardson P.C. to the undersigned at the law firm of King & Spalding LLP. Google is therefore requesting a short second extension of time to respond to Netlist's Complaint, and Netlist has agreed to the extension. Having thus met and conferred on the issue, the parties hereby stipulate that Google's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Netlist's complaint should be extended from January 29, 2010 to February 12, 2010. DATED: January 22, 2010 KING & SPALDING LLP By: /s/ Geoffrey Ezgar __ Geoffrey Ezgar (SBN 184243) Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. PRUETZ LAW GROUP LLP By: /s/ Adrian Pruetz ___ Adrian Pruetz (Bar No. 118215) Attorneys for Plaintiff NETLIST, INC.

22 DATED: January 22, 2010 23 24 25 26 27 28
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

2
CIVIL ACTION NO. CV 09-05718

Case4:09-cv-05718-SBA Document13

Filed01/22/10 Page3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: January 22, 2010

DECLARATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Adrian Pruetz.

KING & SPALDING LLP

By: /s/ Geoffrey Ezgar __ Geoffrey Ezgar (SBN 184243) Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC.

3
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CIVIL ACTION NO. CV 09-05718

Case4:09-cv-05718-SBA Document13

Filed01/22/10 Page4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON NON-REGISTERED CM/ECF PARTY I, Geoffrey M. Ezgar, declare: I am a citizen of the United States and am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to this action. My business address

6 is King & Spalding, 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400, Redwood Shores, CA 94065. I am 7 readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing of documentation for 8 mailing with the United States Postal Service. 9 On the date listed below, following ordinary business practice, I caused to be placed, at

10 my place of business, a true copy of the SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 11 DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, enclosed is a sealed 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CIVIL ACTION NO. CV 09-05718

envelope, with postage fully pre-paid, for collection and mailing with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business, addressed to the participant in the case who is not a registered CM/ECF user as follows: Edward R. Quon Lee Tran & Liang 601 Figueroa Street Suite 4025 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Dated: January 22, 2010 /s/ Geoffrey M. Ezgar Geoffrey M. Ezgar

4