Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 32

NOTICE OF STIPULATION to Select Magistrate Judge Trumbull for Early Settlement Conference and Proposed Order, filed by Netlist, Inc., Google Inc. (Pruetz, Adrian) (Filed on 2/22/2010) Modified on 2/23/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
T Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc. Doc. 32 Case4:09-cv-05718-SBA Document32 Filed02/22/10 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IMOTHY T. SCOTT (CA Bar No. 126971/tscott@kslaw.com) GEOFFREY M. EZGAR (CA Bar No. 184243/gezgar@kslaw.com) LEO SPOONER III (CA Bar No. 241541/lspooner@kslaw.com) KING & SPALDING LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 590-0700 Facsimile: (650) 590-1900 SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (pro hac vice/sweingaertner@kslaw.com) ROBERT F. PERRY (rperry@kslaw.com) ALLISON ALTERSOHN (pro hac vice/aaltersohn@kslaw.com) SUSAN KIM (pro hac vice/skim@kslaw.com) MARK H. FRANCIS (pro hac vice/mfrancis@kslaw.com) DANIEL MILLER (pro hac vice/dmiller@kslaw.com) King & Spalding LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: (212) 556-2100 Facsimile: (212) 556-2222 Attorneys for Plaintiff, GOOGLE INC. Adrian M. Pruetz (CA Bar No. 118215/ampruetz@pruetzlaw.com) Erica J. Pruetz (CA Bar No. 227712/ejpruetz@pruetzlaw.com) PRUETZ LAW GROUP LLP 200 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 1525 El Segundo, California 90245 Telephone: 310.765.7650 Facsimile: 310.765.7641 Steven R. Hansen (CA Bar No. 198401/srh@ltlcounsel.com) Enoch H. Liang (CA Bar No. 212324/ehl@ltlcounsel.com) LEE, TRAN & LIANG APLC 601 S. Figueroa St., Ste. 4025 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: 213.612.3737 Facsimile: 213.612.3773 Attorneys for Defendant, NETLIST, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NETLIST, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. Case No. 09-5718 SBA Related to: 08-04144 SBA NOTICE OF STIPULATION TO SELECT MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL FOR EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STIPULATION RE EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. C09-5718 SBA Dockets.Justia.com W Case4:09-cv-05718-SBA Document32 Filed02/22/10 Page2 of 3 1 HEREAS, on February 16, 2010 the parties filed a Stipulation Re 2 Settlement Conference, in which they agreed that the early settlement conference 3 should proceed before a Magistrate Judge and further agreed to meet and confer 4 further as to selection of a specific Magistrate Judge and to report back to the Court 5 no later than Monday, February 22, 2010. 6 7 WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred on the issue; and WHEREAS, on February 22, 2010, the Court referred the case to Magistrate IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 1. The parties elect to have the Cases referred to a Magistrate Judge Patricia 8 Judge Maria-Elena James for Settlement. 9 10 11 V. Trumbull for an early settlement conference. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ Geoffrey M. Ezgar__________________ GEOFFREY M. EZGAR Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. Dated: February 22, 2010 KING & SPALDING LLP By: /s/ Adrian M. Pruetz ADRIAN M. PRUETZ Attorneys for Plaintiff NETLIST, INC. Dated: February 22, 2010 ADRIAN M. PRUETZ PRUETZ LAW GROUP LLP STIPULATION RE EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 2 CASE NO. C09-5718 SBA Case4:09-cv-05718-SBA Document32 Filed02/22/10 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 DECLARATION OF CONSENT Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 5 penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Adrian 6 M. Pruetz. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February __, 2010 Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge By: /s/ Adrian M. Pruetz ADRIAN M. PRUETZ Attorneys for Plaintiff NETLIST, INC. Dated: February 22, 2010 PRUETZ LAW GROUP LLP STIPULATION RE EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 3 CASE NO. C09-5718 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?