Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 56

STIPULATION and Proposed Order re: Scheduling of Claim Construction Hearing, filed by Netlist, Inc., Google Inc.. (Hansen, Steven) (Filed on 9/1/2010) Modified on 9/2/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Doc. 56

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PRUETZ LAW GROUP LLP Adrian M. Pruetz (Bar No. CA 118215/[e-mail]) Erica J. Pruetz (Bar No. CA 227712/[e-mail]) 200 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 1525 El Segundo, CA 90245 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] LEE TRAN & LIANG APLC Enoch H. Liang (Bar No. CA 212324/[e-mail]) Steven R. Hansen (Bar No. CA 198401/[e-mail]) Edward S. Quon (Bar No. CA 214197/ [e-mail]) 601 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 4025 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff, NETLIST, INC. TIMOTHY T. SCOTT (CA Bar No. 126971/[e-mail]) GEOFFREY M. EZGAR (CA Bar No. 184243/[e-mail]) LEO SPOONER III (CA Bar No. 241541/[e-mail]) KING & SPALDING LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (pro hac vice/[e-mail]) ROBERT F. PERRY ([e-mail]) ALLISON ALTERSOHN (pro hac vice/[e-mail]) DANIEL MILLER (pro hac vice/[e-mail]) KING & SPALDING LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant, GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NETLIST, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC. Defendant. CASE NO. C09-05718 SBA [Related to Civil Action No. C08 04144 SBA] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING

STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING ­ C09-05718 SBA
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, on April 8, 2010, the Court entered the Amended Case Management Scheduling Order setting the date for the Claim Construction Hearing to be September 9, 2010; WHEREAS, all briefing by the parties for the Claim Construction Hearing has been completed pursuant to the Court's April 8, 2010 scheduling order; WHEREAS, on August 5, 2010 the clerk of this Court contacted counsel for Netlist and Google to inform them that the September 9, 2010 hearing would be taken off-calendar and would need to be rescheduled. Based on the Court's availability, the Court clerk suggested alternative dates of October 20, 21, 27, and 28 for the Claim Construction Hearing and asked that counsel for the parties meet and confer regarding such dates; WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred and determined that none of the suggested alternative dates would work for all of the parties; WHEREAS, in view of the trial in the parties' related case Google Inc. v. Netlist, Inc., Case No. 08-4144, being scheduled to begin on November 1, 2010, the parties agreed that the Claim Construction Hearing in this case should be held after such trial to prevent the parties from being unnecessarily distracted and diverting resources from trial preparation; WHEREAS, on August 24, 2010, counsel for Netlist and Google informed the clerk of this Court that the parties were unavailable on the dates originally proposed and requested alternative dates in December 2010; WHEREAS, on August 25, 2010, the clerk of the Court informed the parties that Judge Armstrong would be available to conduct the Claim Construction Hearing on either December 8, 2010 or December 9, 2010; WHEREAS, counsel have met and conferred and request that the Claim Construction Hearing be held on December 8, 2010. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 1. The Claim Construction Hearing set for September 9, 2010 be continued and shall

take place before Judge Armstrong on December 8, 2010 beginning at 9 a.m. In addition, a

1
STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING ­ C09-05718 SBA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

further Case Management Conference shall take place immediately following the Claim Construction Hearing on December 8, 2010.

Dated: August 31, 2010

LEE TRAN & LIANG, APLC By: /s/Daniel J. Taylor_______________________ Daniel J. Taylor Attorneys for Plaintiff NETLIST, INC.

Dated: August 31, 2010

KING & SPALDING LLP By: /s/ Allison Altersohn______________________ Allison Altersohn Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC.

DECLARATION OF CONSENT Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Allison Altersohn. Dated: August 31, 2010 LEE TRAN & LIANG, APLC By: /s/Daniel J. Taylor ____________________ Daniel J. Taylor Attorneys for Plaintiff NETLIST, INC. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ____________, 2010 ________________________________________ Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING ­ C09-05718 SBA