Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 9

First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint Stipulated Joint Motion and Order filed by Google Inc.. (Mack, Shelley) (Filed on 12/23/2009)

Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Doc. 9

Case4:09-cv-05718-SBA Document9

Filed12/23/09 Page1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Howard G. Pollack (CA Bar No. 162897/[e-mail]) Shelley K. Mack (CA Bar No. 209596/[e-mail]) Robert J. Kent (CA Bar No. 250905/[e-mail]) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. Adrian M. Pruetz (Bar No. 118215/[e-mail]) Erica J. Pruetz (Bar No. 227712/[e-mail]) PRUETZ LAW GROUP LLP 200 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 1525 El Segundo, CA 90245 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff NETLIST, INC. Enoch H. Liang (Bar No. 212324/[e-mail]) Steven R. Hansen (Bar No. 198401/[e-mail]) LEE TRAN & LIANG APLC 601 S. Figueroa St., Suite 4025 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff NETLIST, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

NETLIST, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.

Case No. C 09-05718 (CRB) STIPULATED JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

STIPULATED JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Case No. C 09-05718 (CRB)

Dockets.Justia.com

Case4:09-cv-05718-SBA Document9

Filed12/23/09 Page2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Netlist, Inc. ("Netlist") and Defendant Google Inc. ("Google") file this Stipulated Joint Motion to Extent Time for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint. The parties have a mutual interest in the orderly and efficient conduct of this litigation, and they agree that this extension of time will assist the parties in formulating their pleadings and responses in the present action. Having thus met and conferred on the issue, the parties hereby stipulate that Google's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Netlist's complaint should be extended until January 29, 2010, and also move the court to order that this deadline be extended to January 29, 2010.

Dated: December 23, 2009

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Shelley K. Mack Shelley K. Mack Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC.

Dated: December 23, 2009

PRUETZ LAW GROUP LLP

By: /s/ Adrian Pruetz Adrian Pruetz Attorneys for Plaintiff NETLIST, INC.

STIPULATED JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Case No. C 09-05718 (CRB)

Case4:09-cv-05718-SBA Document9

Filed12/23/09 Page3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DECLARATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Adrian Pruetz. Dated: December 23, 2009 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Shelley K. Mack Shelley K. Mack Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC.

STIPULATED JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Case No. C 09-05718 (CRB)

Case4:09-cv-05718-SBA Document9

Filed12/23/09 Page4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
StipJt Mot for EOT to answer (50690100).doc

ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that Google's answer or other response to Netlist's complaint shall be due on January 29, 2010.

Dated this ___ of December, 2009.

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

STIPULATED JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Case No. C 09-05718 (CRB)

Case4:09-cv-05718-SBA Document9

Filed12/23/09 Page5 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
StipJt Mot for EOT to answer (50690100).doc

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on December 23, 2009, all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of the STIPULATED JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule 5-4 and General Order 45. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail. /s/ Robert J. Kent Robert J. Kent

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5
STIPULATED JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Case No. C 09-05718 (EMC)