Murray v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al

Filing 216

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING 214 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2013)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

MARTIN MURRAY,

5
6

No. C 09-5744 CW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING
MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME
(Docket No. 214)

v.

7

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., et al.,

8

Defendants.
________________________________/

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

On March 7, 2013, Plaintiff moved for an extension of time to

11

respond to Defendants’ objection to his reply evidence.

12

rules do not allow parties to respond to objections to reply

13

evidence without first obtaining leave of the Court, see Civil

14

L.R. 7-3(d), and the Court will not grant Plaintiff leave to file

15

such a response here.

16

The local

Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: 3/12/2013

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge