Murray v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
Filing
216
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING 214 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2013)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
MARTIN MURRAY,
5
6
No. C 09-5744 CW
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING
MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME
(Docket No. 214)
v.
7
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., et al.,
8
Defendants.
________________________________/
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
On March 7, 2013, Plaintiff moved for an extension of time to
11
respond to Defendants’ objection to his reply evidence.
12
rules do not allow parties to respond to objections to reply
13
evidence without first obtaining leave of the Court, see Civil
14
L.R. 7-3(d), and the Court will not grant Plaintiff leave to file
15
such a response here.
16
The local
Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: 3/12/2013
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?