Elder-Evins v. Casey et al
Filing
190
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time re: 115 Defendant's motion re: Plaintiff's competency. Plaintiff's opposition brief is now due by February 9, 2012. Defendant's reply brief is now due by February 23, 2012. The hearing is continued to March 15, 2012 (not March 1, 2012, as the parties' stipulated). Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/15/2011. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Michael P. Esser (SBN 268634)
michael.esser@kirkland.com
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 439-1400
Facsimile: (415) 439-1500
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Annette Sharlene Elder-Evins,
for the limited purpose of competency proceedings
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
ANNETTE SHARLENE ELDER-EVINS, Tr.,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
vs.
MICHAEL J. CASEY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 4:09-cv-05775 SBA (LB)
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
EXTENDING TIME AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT
Judge:
Current
Hearing Date:
Proposed
Hearing Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Honorable Laurel Beeler
January 19, 2011
March 1, 2012
11:00 a.m.
4
JOINT STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION
Pursuant to Rule 6-2(a), the parties hereby jointly request that the deadlines be extended as
set forth herein.
22
On April 4, 2011, Defendant Daniel Shacklett filed a Motion Re: Competency to determine
23
Plaintiff’s competency to act as her own attorney. (ECF Nos. 115-117.) On July 29, 2011, this
24
Court set the competency hearing for August 25, 2011. (ECF No. 156.) On August 10, 2011, the
25
Court recommended that the District Court refer Plaintiff to the Federal Pro Bono Project and
26
continued the competency hearing until November 17, 2011. (ECF No. 160.) On October 12, 2011,
27
this Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time and for Continuance of Competency
28
Hearing and continued the hearing until December 15, 2011. (ECF No. 176.) On November 7,
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05775 SBA (LB)
1
2011, this Court granted Plaintiff’s Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time and for
2
Continuance of Competency Hearing and continued the hearing until January 19, 2012. (ECF No.
3
184.)
4
On November 17, 2011, Defendant Shacklett filed a Request to Present Oral Testimony of
5
Dr. Apostle at the Motion Hearing and Order Thereon. (ECF No. 185.) The deposition of Dr.
6
Donald Apostle is scheduled to commence on December 21, 2011.
7
The parties hereto have conferred and request that the Court amend the briefing schedule and
8
continue the hearing date as follows: Plaintiff shall file an opposition to Defendant’s Motion Re:
9
Competency on or before February 9, 2012; Defendant shall file a reply in further support of
10
Defendant’s Motion Re: Competency on or before February 23, 2012; and the hearing on
11
Defendant’s Motion Re: Competency shall be adjourned to March 1, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. Counsel
12
have met and conferred with attorney Robert Good, counsel for Dr. Apostle, and he has indicated his
13
agreement with the proposed schedule. A courtesy copy of this Stipulated Request for Order
14
Extending Time and [Proposed] Order has been transmitted to Mr. Good.
15
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
16
1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to Defendant’s Motion Re: Competency no later than
17
18
19
20
February 9, 2012;
2. Defendant shall file a reply in further support of Defendant’s Motion Re: Competency no
later than February 23, 2012; and
21
3. The hearing on Defendant’s Motion Re: Competency shall be adjourned to
15
March 1, 2012, at 11:00 a.m.
22
4. DECLARATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-2(a): The parties declare that (1) the reason for
23
the requested enlargement of time is Plaintiff’s counsel will depose Dr. Apostle on
24
December 21, 2011, and will require additional time to prepare an opposition to
25
Defendant’s Motion Re: Competency, currently due December 28, 2011, and
26
(2) Defendant’s counsel has a ten to fourteen day trial scheduled to commence on
27
February 3, 2012. The parties hereto do not anticipate that this modification of the
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05775 SBA (LB)
1
briefing schedule and hearing on the Motion Re: Competency will impact other existing
2
deadlines in this case.
3
DATED: December 13, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
4
/s/ Michael P. Esser
Michael P. Esser
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Annette Sharlene Elder-Evins,
for the limited purpose of competency proceedings
5
6
7
8
9
10
/s/ John J. Fritsch
John J. Fritsch
SANTA ROSA COUNTY COUNSEL
100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Room 8
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
Attorneys for Defendant Daniel Shacklett
11
12
13
14
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
19
20
21
December 15
Dated: _____________________, 2011
_______________________________________________
Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler
Plaintiff's opposition brief is due by February 9, 2012, and Defendant's reply brief is due by
February 23, 2012, as the parties stipulated. HOWEVER, the hearing on Defendant's motion
is continued to March 15, 2012, not March 1, 2012.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
3
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05775 SBA (LB)
1
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
2
I, Michael P. Esser, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In
4
compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that the following attorney has concurred in
5
this filing: John J. Fritsch, counsel for Defendant, Daniel Shacklett.
6
7
/s/ Michael P. Esser
Michael P. Esser
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
4
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05775 SBA (LB)
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on December 13, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing
3
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER with
4
the Clerk of the court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e-
5
mail addresses registered, as denoted on the Court’s Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify
6
that I have mailed the foregoing document via the United States Postal Service to the non-CM/ECF
7
participants as listed below.
8
Annette Sharlene Elder-Evins
Guenocamata Sovereign Trust
Guenocamata Racheria
948 Leddy Avenue
Santa Rosa, California 95407
9
10
11
12
DATED: December 13, 2011
13
By: /s/ Michael P. Esser
Michael P. Esser
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05775 SBA (LB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?