Elder-Evins v. Casey et al

Filing 190

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time re: 115 Defendant's motion re: Plaintiff's competency. Plaintiff's opposition brief is now due by February 9, 2012. Defendant's reply brief is now due by February 23, 2012. The hearing is continued to March 15, 2012 (not March 1, 2012, as the parties' stipulated). Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/15/2011. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Michael P. Esser (SBN 268634) michael.esser@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 439-1400 Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 Attorneys for Plaintiff Annette Sharlene Elder-Evins, for the limited purpose of competency proceedings 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 ANNETTE SHARLENE ELDER-EVINS, Tr., Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 vs. MICHAEL J. CASEY, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:09-cv-05775 SBA (LB) STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT Judge: Current Hearing Date: Proposed Hearing Date: Time: Courtroom: Honorable Laurel Beeler January 19, 2011 March 1, 2012 11:00 a.m. 4 JOINT STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION Pursuant to Rule 6-2(a), the parties hereby jointly request that the deadlines be extended as set forth herein. 22 On April 4, 2011, Defendant Daniel Shacklett filed a Motion Re: Competency to determine 23 Plaintiff’s competency to act as her own attorney. (ECF Nos. 115-117.) On July 29, 2011, this 24 Court set the competency hearing for August 25, 2011. (ECF No. 156.) On August 10, 2011, the 25 Court recommended that the District Court refer Plaintiff to the Federal Pro Bono Project and 26 continued the competency hearing until November 17, 2011. (ECF No. 160.) On October 12, 2011, 27 this Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time and for Continuance of Competency 28 Hearing and continued the hearing until December 15, 2011. (ECF No. 176.) On November 7, STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05775 SBA (LB) 1 2011, this Court granted Plaintiff’s Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time and for 2 Continuance of Competency Hearing and continued the hearing until January 19, 2012. (ECF No. 3 184.) 4 On November 17, 2011, Defendant Shacklett filed a Request to Present Oral Testimony of 5 Dr. Apostle at the Motion Hearing and Order Thereon. (ECF No. 185.) The deposition of Dr. 6 Donald Apostle is scheduled to commence on December 21, 2011. 7 The parties hereto have conferred and request that the Court amend the briefing schedule and 8 continue the hearing date as follows: Plaintiff shall file an opposition to Defendant’s Motion Re: 9 Competency on or before February 9, 2012; Defendant shall file a reply in further support of 10 Defendant’s Motion Re: Competency on or before February 23, 2012; and the hearing on 11 Defendant’s Motion Re: Competency shall be adjourned to March 1, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. Counsel 12 have met and conferred with attorney Robert Good, counsel for Dr. Apostle, and he has indicated his 13 agreement with the proposed schedule. A courtesy copy of this Stipulated Request for Order 14 Extending Time and [Proposed] Order has been transmitted to Mr. Good. 15 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 16 1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to Defendant’s Motion Re: Competency no later than 17 18 19 20 February 9, 2012; 2. Defendant shall file a reply in further support of Defendant’s Motion Re: Competency no later than February 23, 2012; and 21 3. The hearing on Defendant’s Motion Re: Competency shall be adjourned to 15 March 1, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. 22 4. DECLARATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-2(a): The parties declare that (1) the reason for 23 the requested enlargement of time is Plaintiff’s counsel will depose Dr. Apostle on 24 December 21, 2011, and will require additional time to prepare an opposition to 25 Defendant’s Motion Re: Competency, currently due December 28, 2011, and 26 (2) Defendant’s counsel has a ten to fourteen day trial scheduled to commence on 27 February 3, 2012. The parties hereto do not anticipate that this modification of the 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05775 SBA (LB) 1 briefing schedule and hearing on the Motion Re: Competency will impact other existing 2 deadlines in this case. 3 DATED: December 13, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 4 /s/ Michael P. Esser Michael P. Esser KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Attorneys for Plaintiff Annette Sharlene Elder-Evins, for the limited purpose of competency proceedings 5 6 7 8 9 10 /s/ John J. Fritsch John J. Fritsch SANTA ROSA COUNTY COUNSEL 100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Room 8 Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Attorneys for Defendant Daniel Shacklett 11 12 13 14 15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 18 19 20 21 December 15 Dated: _____________________, 2011 _______________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler Plaintiff's opposition brief is due by February 9, 2012, and Defendant's reply brief is due by February 23, 2012, as the parties stipulated. HOWEVER, the hearing on Defendant's motion is continued to March 15, 2012, not March 1, 2012. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05775 SBA (LB) 1 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 2 I, Michael P. Esser, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In 4 compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that the following attorney has concurred in 5 this filing: John J. Fritsch, counsel for Defendant, Daniel Shacklett. 6 7 /s/ Michael P. Esser Michael P. Esser 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05775 SBA (LB) 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on December 13, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing 3 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER with 4 the Clerk of the court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e- 5 mail addresses registered, as denoted on the Court’s Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify 6 that I have mailed the foregoing document via the United States Postal Service to the non-CM/ECF 7 participants as listed below. 8 Annette Sharlene Elder-Evins Guenocamata Sovereign Trust Guenocamata Racheria 948 Leddy Avenue Santa Rosa, California 95407 9 10 11 12 DATED: December 13, 2011 13 By: /s/ Michael P. Esser Michael P. Esser 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05775 SBA (LB)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?