Holmes v. Tenderloin Housing Clinic Inc. et al

Filing 18

ORDER RE FURTHER BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 3/26/2010. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC, INC., et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ On March 24, 2010, the court heard argument in connection with the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Service Employees International Union, Local 1021. At the hearing, the court raised the question whether plaintiff could assert a claim under Art. 1, Sec. 8 of the California Constitution against the defendant Union, in view of the fact that the Union is not, and has never been, plaintiff's employer. On March 25, 2010, the Union filed a two-page supplemental brief, arguing that plaintiff could not assert a claim against it under Art. 1, Sec. 8. Before considering the matter further, the court would like to give plaintiff an opportunity to respond to the Union's arguments. Accordingly, no later than March 30, 2010, plaintiff may file a supplemental brief, not to exceed three pages, addressing the issue discussed in the Union's supplemental brief. NATHANIEL HOLMES, Plaintiff, No. C 09-5781 PJH ORDER RE FURTHER BRIEFING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 26, 2010 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge