Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
120
CLERKS NOTICE DEEMING OBJECTION DENIED Re 116 Motion Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.72(A). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
TODD ASHKER, et al.,
6
7
No. C 09-05796 CW
Plaintiffs,
CLERK’S NOTICE
DEEMING OBJECTION
DENIED
v.
8
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. , et al.,
9
Defendants.
/
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
On April 27, 2012, Defendants filed an objection to the
12
Magistrate Judge’s Order Granting In Part Plaintiff’s Visitation
13
Requests filed April 13, 2012.
Civil Local Rule 72-2 states, in
14
part, “The District Judge may deny the objection by written order
15
at any time, but may not grant it without first giving the opposing
16
party an opportunity to brief the matter.
If no order denying the
17
motion or setting a briefing schedule is made within 14 days of the
18
filing of the objection, the objection shall be deemed denied.
The
19
Clerk shall notify parties when an objection has been deemed
20
denied.”
Fourteen days has passed since the filing of the
21
objection to the Magistrate Judge’s order, and the Court has not
22
issued an order.
Accordingly,
23
Notice is hereby given that Defendant’s objection is deemed
24
denied.
25
26
Dated: 5/18/2012
27
28
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?