Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 120

CLERKS NOTICE DEEMING OBJECTION DENIED Re 116 Motion Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.72(A). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 TODD ASHKER, et al., 6 7 No. C 09-05796 CW Plaintiffs, CLERK’S NOTICE DEEMING OBJECTION DENIED v. 8 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. , et al., 9 Defendants. / United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 On April 27, 2012, Defendants filed an objection to the 12 Magistrate Judge’s Order Granting In Part Plaintiff’s Visitation 13 Requests filed April 13, 2012. Civil Local Rule 72-2 states, in 14 part, “The District Judge may deny the objection by written order 15 at any time, but may not grant it without first giving the opposing 16 party an opportunity to brief the matter. If no order denying the 17 motion or setting a briefing schedule is made within 14 days of the 18 filing of the objection, the objection shall be deemed denied. The 19 Clerk shall notify parties when an objection has been deemed 20 denied.” Fourteen days has passed since the filing of the 21 objection to the Magistrate Judge’s order, and the Court has not 22 issued an order. Accordingly, 23 Notice is hereby given that Defendant’s objection is deemed 24 denied. 25 26 Dated: 5/18/2012 27 28 Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?