Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 1709

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting 1708 Stipulation for Extension of Time Re Opposition and Reply Briefing on Plaintiffs' Second Motion for De Novo Determination of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge Regarding Retaliation Against Class Member. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2022)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

JULES LOBEL (pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
SAMUEL MILLER (Bar No. 138942)
Email: [e-mail]
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
666 Broadway, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10012
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND DIVISION

11
12

TODD ASHKER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16

v.
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendants.

17

Case No.: 4:09-cv-05796-CW (RMI)
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME RE OPPOSITION
AND REPLY BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFFS’
SECOND MOTION FOR DE NOVO
DETERMINATION OF DISPOSITIVE
MATTER REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE REGARDING RETALIATION
AGAINST CLASS MEMBER
Judge:

18

The Honorable Claudia Wilken

19
20

1.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a motion on September 19, 2022 for de novo review

21

regarding their Second Motion to Enforce Anti-Retaliation Provision of Settlement Agreement. ECF

22

No. 1702.

23

2.

WHEREAS, due to Plaintiffs’ counsel’s unavailability from October 4-11, 2022,

24

Plaintiffs, with good cause, have requested, and Defendants have agreed to stipulate to, a one-week

25

extension of the remaining filing deadlines.

26

3.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between

27

the parties, through their counsel of record, that Defendants shall have up to and including October 10,

28

2022 for the filing of an Opposition, and Plaintiffs shall have up to and including October 17, 2022 for
STIP & ORDER FOR EXT. OF
TIME RE BRIEFING

Case No. 4:09-cv-05796-CW (RMI)

1

their reply. This schedule allows that briefing will be completed 17 days prior to the scheduled hearing

2

date of November 3, 2022. ECF No. 1702.

3

4.

Defendants’ agreement to this stipulated extension is made with the following

4

reservation of rights: Defendants do not object to Plaintiffs’ request to alter the briefing schedule

5

reflected on the docket at ECF No. 1702; however, Defendants dispute that Plaintiffs are entitled to a

6

reply and do not waive any argument to that effect by stipulating to the altered briefing schedule.

7
8

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: October 3, 2022

9

Respectfully submitted,
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

10

/s/ Samuel Miller
SAMUEL MILLER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

11
12
13

ROB BONTA
Attorney General of California

14

/s/ Sarah M. Brattin
SARAH M. BRATTIN
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants

15
16
17
18

ORDER

19

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

Dated:

September 4, 2022

The Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP & ORDER FOR EXT. OF TIME RE
BRIEFING

2

Case No. 4:09-cv-05796-CW (RMI)