Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 1944

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 1935 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs for Thirty-First Quarter of Monitoring and Enforcement of Settlement Agreement filed by Paul Redd, Richard Johnson, Jeffrey Franklin, Ronnie Dewberry, George Ruiz, Luis Esquivel, George Franco, Danny Troxell, Gabriel Reyes, Todd Ashker, Motions terminated: 1941 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time re Plaintiffs' Reply re Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs for Thirty-F irst Quarter of Monitoring and Enforcement of Settlement Agreement filed by Paul Redd, Richard Johnson, Jeffrey Franklin, Ronnie Dewberry, George Ruiz, Luis Esquivel, George Franco, Danny Troxell, Todd Ashker, Gabriel Reyes., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 1941 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time re Plaintiffs' Reply re Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs for Thirty-First Quarter of Monitoring and Enforcement of Settlement Agreement, 1935 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs for Thirty-First Quarter of Monitoring and Enforcement of Settlement Agreement. Replies due by 10/27/2023. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/17/2023. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2023)

Download PDF
Case 4:09-cv-05796-CW Document 1941 Filed 10/16/23 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 JULES LOBEL (pro hac vice) Email: jll4@pitt.edu SAMUEL MILLER (Bar No. 138942) Email: samrmiller@yahoo.com CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 666 Broadway, 7th Floor New York, NY 10012 Tel: (212) 614-6464 Fax: (212) 614-6499 CARMEN E. BREMER (pro hac vice) Email: carmen.bremer@bremerlawgroup.com STEVEN D. BREMER (pro hac vice) Email: steven.bremer@bremerlawgroup.com BREMER LAW GROUP PLLC 1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2100 Seattle, WA 98101 Tel: (206) 357-8442 Fax: (206) 858-9730 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 OAKLAND DIVISION 17 18 TODD ASHKER, et al., Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 22 23 v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. Case No.: 4:09-cv-05796-CW (RMI) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY RE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THIRTY-FIRST QUARTER OF MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Judge: The Honorable Claudia Wilken 24 25 26 27 28 STIP & ORDER FOR EXT. OFTIME RE Q31 REPLY Case No. 4:09-cv-05796-CW (RMI) Case 4:09-cv-05796-CW Document 1941 Filed 10/16/23 Page 2 of 3 1 1. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs for Thirty-First 2 Quarter of Monitoring and Enforcement of Settlement Agreement on September 29, 2023. (ECF Nos. 3 1934 (sealed) & 1935.) Defendants filed an opposition on October 13, 2023. (ECF No. 1936.) The 4 current deadline for Plaintiffs to file a reply is October 20, 2023. (Local Rule 7-3(c)). 5 2. WHEREAS, due to pressing family obligations of Plaintiffs’ principal fees counsel at 6 this time, Plaintiffs, with good cause, have requested, and Defendants have agreed to stipulate to, a 7 one-week extension of the filing deadline. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 3. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, through their counsel of record, that Plaintiffs shall have up to and including October 27, 2023 to file their reply. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: October 16, 2023 Respectfully submitted, CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS /s/ Samuel Miller SAMUEL MILLER Attorneys for Plaintiffs 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ROB BONTA Attorney General of California ADRIANO HRVATIN Supervising Deputy Attorney General /s/ Le-Mai D. Lyons LE-MAI D. LYONS Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP & ORDER FOR EXT. OF TIME RE Q31 REPLY 2 Case No. 4:09-cv-05796-CW (RMI) Case 4:09-cv-05796-CW Document 1941 Filed 10/16/23 Page 3 of 3 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: 10/17/2024 The Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP & ORDER FOR EXT. OF TIME RE Q31 REPLY 3 Case No. 4:09-cv-05796-CW (RMI)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?