Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 580

ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Compliance and Plaintiffs' Motion to Enjoin CDCR. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 7/7/2016. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUREKA DIVISION 11 12 TODD ASHKER, et al., 4:09-05796 CW (NJV) 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO ENJOIN CDCR 14 v. 15 16 GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Docs. 513, 524. 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 On April 12, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Compel Compliance. (Doc. 513.) On May 21 10, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Enjoin CDCR from Continuing to Retain Five Prisoners in 22 SHU.” (Doc. 524.) Defendants opposed both motions. (Docs. 517, 536.) On June 10, 2016, the 23 Court heard argument on each motion. Having considered Plaintiffs’ motions, the parties’ 24 briefing, the Court’s files, and the argument of counsel, and for the reasons stated on the record at 25 the June 10, 2016 hearing, the court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motions to compel compliance and to 26 enjoin CDCR. 27 28 With respect to the rules violation reports for conspiracy to commit murder reissued by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to inmates George Franco, Antonio 1 1 Guillen, Samuel Luna, and Donald Moran, Defendants shall produce copies of the reissued rules 2 violations to Plaintiffs’ counsel by June 17, 2016. The reissued rules violations shall be heard by 3 no later than July 15, 2016. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: July 7, 2016 _______________________________________ The Honorable Nandor J. Vadas United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?